Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Corelight comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (25th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (3rd), Cisco Security Portfolio (3rd)
Corelight
Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category, the market share of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 9.1% and it decreased by 27.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Corelight is 7.7% and it increased by 39.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Unique Categories:
Network Monitoring Software
1.5%
Network Detection and Response (NDR)
9.3%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Payne - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
Improved our organization greatly but greater customizability would be beneficial
The customizability of the UI should improve. With Splunk and other SIEM tools, you have the ability to create custom dashboards and manipulate the data in a way that works for you. Cisco gives you some creative ability, but you are very much locked into their train of thought. It would be helpful if they went more down the Splunk and Elastic route. We found flaws in Stealthwatch, but thankfully it has the ability to interconnect with Splunk and other such tools. This enabled us to plug the information over where it falls flat and then start working on other platforms. The solution falls down but tries to make up for it. I would also like to have greater insight into how it works under the hood. I appreciate that that might not be possible due to commercial confidentiality. However, having that greater insight would allow us to covey a level of trust to the people who use it.
HamadaElewa - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2024
An expensive solution to monitor internet traffic with multiple dashboards
The huge library especially the open source link, makes it the main engine for Corelight with some enhancements in the commercial version. It has a very powerful level, such as signature-based attacks or behavioral attacks, with enhancements in the design. It is very flexible for intelligent implementations like IPs, especially between big companies and banks. Corelight is easy to understand and monitor what is going on behind the team. The solution is already integrated with other systems like Suricata, Elastic, and Microsoft tools. It's very easy to integrate signature-based or behavior-based engines. You can use Elastic for the dashboards to get it from Corelight, along with all the benefits and expandability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This product alleviates the day-to-day headaches for us, in regards to metrics."
"It provides good visibility to the customers. People are still evaluating it, but it provides visibility and helps them to take action to remediate and mitigate the issues that are highlighted on the dashboard. It has good integration with the Cisco switching platform."
"I believe this solution has reduced our incident response time."
"Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"The most valuable feature is having visibility into the data segments throughout our network."
"Stealthwatch has greatly improved our network visibility, in terms of bandwidth, malware, and PCI violations."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the way the net flow is being merged together in a single pane. That's been extremely useful for us, because can see what's going on with traffic in one single place."
"The solution reduces the amount of time it takes to detect and remediate threats."
"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."
"Corelight is easy to use."
"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."
"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."
"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."
 

Cons

"I would like Cisco to make it easier for the administrators to use it."
"The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified."
"Reliance on Java. Get away from that."
"One area that could be improved in SNA is the integration with Cisco ISE for user and session details, which currently requires additional setup."
"Stealthwatch needs improvement when it comes to speed."
"There could be better integration on the programming side, which uses Python. StealthWatch could provide a template for Python to manage the switches. For example, it would be nice if StealthWatch bounced a port automatically it detected something anomalous."
"I think the interface is a little lacking. The interface seems like it just needs to be modernized. It's been the same interface now, ever since I've seen it probably four years ago."
"There's a lot of traffic on our network that we don't see sometimes."
"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."
"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."
"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."
"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."
"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000."
"​Licensing is done by flows per second, not including outside (in traffic)."
"Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions."
"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it."
"We pay for support costs on a yearly basis."
"The pricing for this solution is good."
"The licensing costs are outrageous."
"Today, we are part of the big Cisco ELA, and it is a la carte. We can get orders for whatever we want. At the end of the day, we have to pay for it in one big expense, but that is fine. We are okay with that."
"It's a yearly fee and depends on what you are looking for."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Stealthwatch?
The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?
I would rate Cisco SNA as a nine out of ten in terms of costliness.
What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?
Initially, I felt Cisco Secure Network Analytics lacked integration with Splunk. However, with Cisco's recent acquisition of Splunk, it seems this gap will be addressed. If this integration happens...
What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?
The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...
What do you like most about Corelight?
It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Corelight?
The solution is too expensive compared to others. If you have the technical knowledge, it's good. Corelight is a very big gap between you and others if you’re new.
 

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF
Education First
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Corelight and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.