IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (25th)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (5th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the market share of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4% and it increased by 243.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Selenium HQ is 6.7% and it decreased by 57.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Functional Testing Tools
4.1%
Regression Testing Tools
4.9%
 

Featured Reviews

it_user323943 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 21, 2015
We can edit captured transactions and organize them by those for which we require performance metrics, but it lacks a set of manuals or guides that would take out some guess work.
It is used to capture and generate HTTP tests. The capture process is very easy. After this, we edited the captured transactions to organize them into the sections or transactions we require performance metrics for (i.e. splash page, user authentication, main pageload, logout, etc.). This editing process is easy to perform with the interface provided in Rational Performance Tester Finally, Rational Performance Tester has an import/export feature that has been extremely useful. We have used it to export our complete test library and import it into another Rational Performance Tester server with no loss or issues. This allows for platform test migrations and backup.
MD
Apr 26, 2023
Helps with critical deployments and test automation of web
We use the solution for the test automation of web solutions. It also helps us to create web browsers.   My company uses the solution for critical deployments.  I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website.  I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies."
"It's easy for new people to get trained on this solution. If we are hiring new people, the resource pool in the market in test automation is largely around Selenium."
"The solution is free to use."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"Selenium HQ has a lot of capabilities and is compatible with many languages."
 

Cons

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."
"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"There are some synchronization issues"
"For people that don't know about technology, maybe it's difficult to use."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"Selenium HQ can improve the authorization login using OTP, it is not able to be done in this solution."
"It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium."
"The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
"Selenium HQ is a free and open-source solution and is supported by Google."
"Selenium HQ is a free, open-source solution."
"Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
"It is free."
"Currently, Selenium HQ is free for customers."
"The setup cost is open source or free."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
 

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2024.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.