IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs WebLogic Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (8th)
WebLogic Suite
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Infrastructure category, the market share of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 1.6% and it increased by 67.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of WebLogic Suite is 4.5% and it decreased by 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure
Unique Categories:
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
3.1%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Ajit Pillai - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2023
Helps our organization integrate disparate systems, but it is a weighty product
We primarily use the solution as an integration platform to integrate disparate systems at the bank The solution has improved our organization by centralizing all our integrations. The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable. The solution can be improved…
Abdou Mohamadou - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 12, 2023
Simple setup, reliable, and performs well
Our organization uses Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) for managing our operations and deployments. We also utilize WebLogic and ADF in conjunction with ODI. We utilize WebLogic to deploy all of our web-based programs using Java and all of our Oracle web services The most valuable feature of WebLogic…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is the ability to facilitate communication with legacy systems, offering a multitude of great capabilities. For example, if there is a mainframe system in place with a web service serving as the front end. In that case, the solution enables efficient protocol transformations to convert all request payloads into a format that the legacy systems can accept, rendering the integration and transformation processes seamless and highly effective."
"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."
"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."
"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."
"The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable."
"We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern."
"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."
"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."
"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."
"The solution is useful for centralizing data."
"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides one place where you can control all of the services."
"Scalability on the solution is great. It's very very easy to scale."
"WebLogic Suite is scalable."
"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
 

Cons

"The solution can add container engines such as docker."
"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."
"Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The installation configuration is quite difficult."
"It is currently a weighty product."
"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."
"I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage."
"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."
"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"The support is not good."
"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."
"I think the support could be much better."
"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."
"There are sometimes issues with clusters."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is more expensive than competing products."
"The solution is expensive."
"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."
"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."
"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"
"The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."
"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."
"Scaling is costly."
"Technical support is very costly."
"The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
The solution is expensive. I give the cost a one out of ten. We pay for an annual license.
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement.
What do you like most about WebLogic Suite?
The solution is useful for centralizing data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WebLogic Suite?
We pay for Oracle Premier Support. The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support.
What needs improvement with WebLogic Suite?
The documentation is too broad. The content search is not easy. We see a lot of sources of information, but we must dig in to get what we need. We need to do trial and error. It might be because th...
 

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire
State Revenue Office Victoria, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Reliance Commercial Finance, Center for Railway Information Systems, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, MCB Bank, Pacfico Seguros Generales
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. WebLogic Suite and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.