Veeva Medical CRM vs konectar comparison

konectar
Read 1 konectar review
  • 576 Views
  • 97 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Veeva Medical CRM
Read 1 Veeva Medical CRM review
  • 999 Views
  • 339 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Categories and Ranking

konectar
Ranking in KOL Management Software
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veeva Medical CRM
Ranking in KOL Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the KOL Management Software category, the market share of konectar is 10.0% and it increased by 56.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Veeva Medical CRM is 33.3% and it increased by 18.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
KOL Management Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

RK
Jun 8, 2022
Great KOL sentiment tracking and usability across devices with the ability to capture various activities
Our primary use case of this solution is described below with details about our environment. We wanted to identify the regional rising stars for multiple engagement activities with key opinion leaders. We wanted to expand our coverage to global key opinion leaders outside the US. Our field team…
Read full review
AladdinNabil - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 30, 2022
Stable CRM solution designed for medical organizations, with a medical content approval feature, but is lacking in integration
An area for improvement in Veeva Medical CRM is its integration with other platforms. Currently, it's very, very limited and restricted, unlike Salesforce, but Salesforce is a solution that's not specific to the medical industry. Salesforce is a more general solution. If we want to link any data or any visit inside Veeva Medical CRM to anything outside, or anything external, we have to build that functionality manually. If the solution could be integrated with other solutions that will allow us to import data automatically so it's not time consuming, it would make Veeva Medical CRM better. This is the number one area for improvement I see in the solution. Another area for improvement in Veeva Medical CRM is its scalability. Veeva Medical CRM integration with other solutions would make our lives easier, so it's an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"konectar has helped us to interact with KOLs compliantly."
"The most valuable feature in Veeva Medical CRM is medical content approval."
 

Cons

"konectar Virtual Engagement platform could be improved with better screen sharing clarity, which is a bit blurred, during the beginning of the call."
"An area for improvement in Veeva Medical CRM is its integration with other platforms. Currently, it's very, very limited and restricted, unlike Salesforce, but Salesforce is a solution that's not specific to the medical industry. Salesforce is a more general solution. If we want to link any data or any visit inside Veeva Medical CRM to anything outside, or anything external, we have to build that functionality manually."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which KOL Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
12%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Healthcare Company
13%
Pharma/Biotech Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about konectar?
konectar has helped us to interact with KOLs compliantly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with konectar?
The konectar KOL Management platform could improve on the following features, though they are minor improvements: * konectar Virtual Engagement platform could be improved with better screen sharing...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for konectar?
Our primary use case of this solution is described below with details about our environment. We wanted to identify the regional rising stars for multiple engagement activities with key opinion lead...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Superfly KOL Management vs konectar Logo
Superfly KOL Management vs konectar
Compared 72% of the time
Monocl Professional vs konectar Logo
Monocl Professional vs konectar
Compared 28% of the time
More konectar Competitors
Superfly KOL Management vs Veeva Medical CRM Logo
Superfly KOL Management vs Veeva Medical CRM
Compared 77% of the time
Monocl Professional vs Veeva Medical CRM Logo
Monocl Professional vs Veeva Medical CRM
Compared 23% of the time
More Veeva Medical CRM Competitors
 

Learn More

Aissel Technologies
Veeva Systems
 

Overview

Aissel is a Software Technology Solutions and Business Research company. Our enterprise-class software solutions cater to the business intelligence needs of industry leading Pharmaceutical and Biotech companies. KOL Management Suite is our flagship product that enables our customers to integrate, manage and monitor their KOL development and management initiatives.

Veeva Medical CRM helps you develop strategic relationships and engage with key stakeholders across channels.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Abbott, Accera, ABIOMED, Atlantic research group
See our list of best KOL Management Software vendors.

We monitor all KOL Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.