MVISION CNAPP vs Skyhigh Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Container Security (6th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
MVISION CNAPP
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
24th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Skyhigh Security
Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (12th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (6th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (10th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (17th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) category, the market share of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.2% and it increased by 56.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of MVISION CNAPP is 0.1% and it decreased by 86.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Skyhigh Security is 0.7% and it decreased by 32.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.8%
No other categories found
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
2.6%
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
4.8%
 

Featured Reviews

AK
May 7, 2024
Is user-friendly, reduces false positives, and improves security posture
Having too many resources with platform access made misconfigurations more likely. PingSafe addressed this by helping us configure everything according to best practices, helping improve our security posture. PingSafe is easy to use. Evidence-based alerts help us mitigate the priority issues that are detected. The proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting is helpful. The offensive security engine strengthens our organization's security posture by validating potential attacker paths and prioritizing vulnerabilities with the highest likelihood of being exploited in a breach. Infrastructure as Code facilitates the identification of pre-production issues within our Cloud Formation Templates and Terraform configurations. PingSafe has been instrumental in ensuring our strong cloud security posture, effectively helping us manage and mitigate risks. PingSafe helped our team reduce the number of false positives. PingSafe plays a key role in strengthening our risk posture. By providing alerts, it assists both our information security and security assessment teams in identifying and mitigating potential threats, ultimately improving our overall security position. It has improved our mean time to detection by 30 percent and effectively reduces our average time to resolve incidents. By providing valuable information, PingSafe empowers our team to quickly diagnose and rectify problems. It has improved the collaboration of our cloud security application developers and AppSec teams. PingSafe has helped save engineering time by 50 percent.
Use MVISION CNAPP?
Share your opinion
Santiago Gomez - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2023
Has improved the organization's PCI compliance with data loss prevention
I use the solution on a Macintosh computer and it has issues and does not work when I try to log in from the Safari Browser, but it works fine when I log in from the Google Chrome browser. The console has issues when the login is done through a Safari Browser. The console has to be more competitive and the compatibility of the browser needs to be better. I want to know about Skyhigh's competitiveness with other brands and about the vulnerability assessment and micro segmentations. I know Skyhigh has other products, but right now, I am studying what this new product is about. They only have English support, so I would like for them to add some Spanish support.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing was a little less than other providers."
"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"PingSafe falls somewhere in the middle price range, neither particularly cheap nor expensive."
"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
"It was reasonable pricing for me."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
"The tool is cost-effective."
Information not available
"Commercially, I find Skyhigh Security a little costlier, compared to other products such as SentinelOne or Cybereason which are really novelty products. I'm not comparing Skyhigh Security with Trend Micro, but with other products, in particular the new, next-generation products. The price for Skyhigh Security is high in terms of value and ROI. I would rate the product price combined with product efficacy a six out of ten."
"It's an expensive solution."
"There is a license required to use this solution and it is paid annually. The price is reasonable."
"Pricing is not out of reach."
"The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations."
"The solution is quite expensive. As we take add-ons continuously as per our customer's requirements, there are additional charges."
"Pricing for Skyhigh Security is fine."
"This is an expensive product, although it is made for larger enterprises and not for small organizations."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
No data available
Educational Organization
44%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Cloud?
The pricing is good and the licensing is straightforward. I'd rate the affordability nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Cloud?
The secure gateway could be improved. If they worked on that they would be more competitive. They should offer more l...
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
No data available
McAfee MVISION Cloud, McAfee MVISION Unified Cloud Edge, McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee MVISION CNAPP, and Skyhigh Networks, McAfee Web Gateway
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Western Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP). Updated: June 2024.
787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.