Find out in this report how the two Mainframe Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Report (Updated: June 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

June 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,383 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (14th)

SYSVIEW Performance Intelli...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Mainframe Management category, the market share of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 5.2% and it decreased by 9.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is 15.6% and it decreased by 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Management

Unique Categories:

Event Monitoring

1.6%

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

it_user351621

IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Nov 20, 2015

The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.

We used to us an IBM product, but OPS/MVS has a lot more flexibility in what we can do with it. We're able to do a lot more ad hoc-type things. We can set up for different events, or do out-paging for a mainframe interface, or issue MVS commands. It's flexible enough for us to use it when needed…

Read full review

it_user507378

Vice President at BNYMellon

Sep 6, 2016

Applications see what's wrong with a transaction and make corrections.

I think a lot of the stuff has to zero in and make it quicker. I think overall the SYSVIEW product right now has a lot of commands. There's a lot of panels. A lot of information. What we need to do is trim it down for the applications or the avid user. A lot of what they're doing right now, they're bringing in new hires out of college. We don't want to make it more difficult to use. We want to make it easier to use. I think SYSVIEW has to sit down and look at the tool. That's what we're trying to do with them now, make it a little bit easier to utilize versus trying to remember all these individual commands. It would take something simple; develop a couple more panels, fast path panels.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

"If something breaks and it goes down when it's not supposed to, automation brings it right back up."

"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."

"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."

"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."

"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."

"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

"I also really appreciated all the work that everybody did to get it functional for JES3, and they continue to do so, even though IBM said they are going to do away with JES3."

"Thresholds with alerts are valuable, enabling us to fix a problem before it has an impact."

"I use most of the SMS space management extensively, but also the features that enable me to look at dumps and different dataset allocations to the system, and performance data from the queueing and delays."

"The stability is very reliable. We have not had any issues."

"The scalability is absolutely fine."

"When we changed to JES3, the programmers didn't have to know anything. The product provided the same interface with the same look and feel."

"It is easy to see if anything is wrong. The queues on the system are fast, and it is very intuitive to locate something."

"We have not had any major issues in approximately 15 years."

More SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence pros

Cons

"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

"The documentation format could be better. I noticed with the last release that all of the manuals were bundled into one. It used to have a separate installation guide, user guide, etc."

"They are already working on improvements. One of them is the operational intelligence, which is a lot of stuff I am trying to learn and work on right now, which SYSVIEW reports to that all the system things which are going on."

"It confuses a lot of people because there are so many features, but when they see me bouncing around they say, "I didn't know it did that, I didn't know it did that." It takes a long time to find all the different features that are available."

"The documentation, like installation guides and stuff, put it all in one place."

"The things that I would think about would be in relation to JES3. However, I don't know if they'll be able to do much more with that because I don't know how much longer IBM is going to be supporting JES3. So I can understand not doing additional development. But if I were to suggest something it would be the JES3 initiators, the JES3 queues."

"If a unit of work ID is associated with a CICS, a DB2, and a MQ transaction, and having that capability correlate to those different technologies via one business application transaction which would be beneficial."

"We are using Datacom as the database system, so maybe a little bit more integration with that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is a little steep, but there are a lot of other functions that it brings together. It gives you one window to look through to get to a lot of different features. The more products you have from CA, the better pricing they have, the more you can get them doing more things for you."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Logistics Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Comparisons

BMC MainView vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 53% of the time

BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 25% of the time

SCOM vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 23% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 49% of the time

BMC MainView vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 33% of the time

ASG TMON vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 11% of the time

BMC Automated Mainframe Intelligence vs SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Compared 7% of the time

More SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

May 2024

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Buyer's Guide

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

May 2024

Download SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence product report

Also Known As

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

CA SYSVIEW Performance Management, CA SYSVIEW, Unicenter CA-SYSVIEW Realtime Performance Management

Learn More

Broadcom

Overview

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

CA SYSVIEW Performance Management offers new levels of visibility into critical business transactions that provide 24x7 monitoring for complex application environments. This real-time visibility is a critical asset to simplify mainframe performance management by monitoring against alerts, drilling down for intuitive problem identification, and basing automation on performance intelligence. Instead of using different tools, processes and people to support each environment, now there's an enterprise-wide solution that monitors the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems, providing additional integrated data.

Sample Customers

Tieto

Tieto, Navy Federal Credit Union (NFCU)

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

June 2024

Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence

Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence report.

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.