Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planisware comparison

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."

"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."

"The solution's tech support is good."

"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."

"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."

"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."

"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"The solution itself is cost-effective."

"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."

"The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."

"My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"There are training and certification costs."