Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection vs Trellix Collaboration Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Proofpoint Targeted Attack ...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (24th)
Trellix Collaboration Security
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (15th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (8th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the market share of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is 3.0% and it decreased by 23.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Collaboration Security is 0.7% and it decreased by 70.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Email Security
4.0%
 

Featured Reviews

KC
Aug 17, 2021
Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console
We have two to three issues per month. We contact Proofpoint's customer support for these issues. I am a major point of contact for support. If I am not able to resolve an issue, we will be reaching out to them. Proofpoint can take a couple of days to get back. I also deal with other applications from Okta and Microsoft, and we get the support within a couple of hours. There is a lot of difference between a couple of hours and a couple of days. So, Proofpoint's support should be improved. Okta and Microsoft are also able to do a Zoom or video call, but Proofpoint provides support only through email communication. Only if you request, it would be a Zoom or video session.
Murali Krishnan L - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 20, 2022
The auto-remediation, Riskware rules features are valuable, but spam detection could be better
I use FireEye Email Security to block spam and advanced threats FireEye ETP has blocked several campaigns that lead to the post compromise deployment of ransomware, Obfuscated Outlook Phishing impersonation, Attachment based Phishing The auto-remediation feature is valuable and Riskware rules is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."
"FireEye Email Security is easy to use."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its simplicity. It's very user-friendly."
"I like FireEye's filtering, spam digests, and its advanced threat review of email flow. It also has a broad range of riskware rules you can deploy."
"One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment."
"The product protects my email."
"FireEye Email Security helps us prevent spam and phishing emails and all other business-compromised email attacks."
"The product helps reduce the number of malicious emails reaching the user's inbox."
"We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."
 

Cons

"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."
"Sometimes especially zero-day spam emails can be passed to the user's inbox."
"In general, our company should make the tool more robust to protect our systems."
"I would like to see this solution become more flexible."
"FireEye needs single sign-on. They say it's on their roadmap. They should also implement support for Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA."
"The spam detection feature could be better."
"The custom tailoring is limited."
"The solution is not easy to set up. However, we have employees that have the knowledge that can do the difficult implementation. It would be better if the process was easier."
"I would like the solution to be able to automatically quarantine the malicious emails before getting to the user's mailbox and continue with regular email operations. This could result in the user clicking the email before the purge operation is completed."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing is on a yearly basis."
"The solution requires a license to be purchased for every user."
"I rate the product price as nine out of ten, where ten is the most expensive, and one is the cheapest. There is no need to pay any extra charges apart from the licensing costs."
"The cost is very high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about FireEye Email Security?
One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment.
What needs improvement with FireEye Email Security?
Technology is an area that is evolving every day. As changes are introduced on a day-to-day basis, I feel that my company should evaluate the products we use. In general, our company should make th...
What is your primary use case for FireEye Email Security?
Ideally, I don't manage the installation, but I do manage the security part. I am responsible for defining security-based best practices and implementing them in our company's environment. I know a...
 

Also Known As

Targeted Attack Protection
FireEye Email Security
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brinker Capital
Northshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: June 2024.
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.