My company has a partnership with Symantec and is a distributor of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. I'm not doing any maintenance on the solution because it's cloud-based, so usually end-users open tickets directly with the support team or with technical consultants who are in charge of handling the issues. Right now, it's very good, for example, last month had good maintenance compared to other months. Years ago, the maintenance schedule you get from Symantec, from Broadcom, was very bad. You don't get much detail and it was very complicated. Currently, there are not many complaints from the users because Symantec can now better handle the maintenance and sort out problems about Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. I don't have a lot of advice for people looking into implementing the solution, because it's very easy to use. It's not a complex solution. Just from the default policy, it's already good. A user can go with the default policy, and there's no complicated issue that would arise from implementing Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. Maybe in other cases, when the configurations need more detail, those could result in complex implementations. I'm rating Symantec Cloud Workload Protection eight out of ten.
This is a very good tool for cloud protection. It covers workloads on platforms like Azure and Google. During my POC, I haven't faced any performance-related issues. As of now, whatever we have needed, this product has. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: April 2024.
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) designed to protect cloud environments, addressing the security needs of workloads in public, private, and hybrid cloud settings. CWPPs are vital to ensure that your data and applications are safeguarded against threats.
My company has a partnership with Symantec and is a distributor of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. I'm not doing any maintenance on the solution because it's cloud-based, so usually end-users open tickets directly with the support team or with technical consultants who are in charge of handling the issues. Right now, it's very good, for example, last month had good maintenance compared to other months. Years ago, the maintenance schedule you get from Symantec, from Broadcom, was very bad. You don't get much detail and it was very complicated. Currently, there are not many complaints from the users because Symantec can now better handle the maintenance and sort out problems about Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. I don't have a lot of advice for people looking into implementing the solution, because it's very easy to use. It's not a complex solution. Just from the default policy, it's already good. A user can go with the default policy, and there's no complicated issue that would arise from implementing Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. Maybe in other cases, when the configurations need more detail, those could result in complex implementations. I'm rating Symantec Cloud Workload Protection eight out of ten.
This is a very good tool for cloud protection. It covers workloads on platforms like Azure and Google. During my POC, I haven't faced any performance-related issues. As of now, whatever we have needed, this product has. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.