Enterprise Archiect/ IBM & Redhat Business Development at Cancom
Real User
Top 5
2023-12-12T13:54:00Z
Dec 12, 2023
Licensing costs are always debatable. While there are free, open-source alternatives like Java EE and WildFly, they lack the support and reliability of a paid, certified product like JBoss. With JBoss, you get the peace of mind of premium support and avoid potential issues in production environments.
Licensing is flexible. It comes in a subscription model, so it doesn't actually lock to a specific server. That's one of the good things. Licensing costs vary from company to company. It depends on the requirements and size. Definitely, it is better than the proprietary cost. Everything is included under the license. there are extra fees.
Application Server Manager at Centro Nacional de Registros
Real User
Top 10
2021-12-21T11:47:00Z
Dec 21, 2021
We pay to license on a yearly basis. We were spending something like $12,000 in the first year. This year it's something close to $16,000. We don't have additional fees or anything like that. It's a standard subscription.
I'm not sure of the exact pricing, however, my sense is that it's expensive as the client no longer wants to pay for it and would like to move away from it or onto the cloud.
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), a market-leading, fully certified Java EE platform, gives you a single platform to quickly develop and deploy applications. Use traditional Red Hat JBoss EAP to gain business agility with your existing applications and reduce the costs of proprietary platforms.
The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic.
We pay a yearly subscription fee. There are no additional costs associated with the product.
Licensing costs are always debatable. While there are free, open-source alternatives like Java EE and WildFly, they lack the support and reliability of a paid, certified product like JBoss. With JBoss, you get the peace of mind of premium support and avoid potential issues in production environments.
We didn't pay for a license because we used the JBoss community edition, which is free.
JBoss is an expensive solution. Customers need to pay for a yearly license for JBoss.
JBoss is open-source and free. There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use.
It is an open-source solution.
Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees. The only element that requires payment is RHEL.
The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten.
Licensing is flexible. It comes in a subscription model, so it doesn't actually lock to a specific server. That's one of the good things. Licensing costs vary from company to company. It depends on the requirements and size. Definitely, it is better than the proprietary cost. Everything is included under the license. there are extra fees.
We pay to license on a yearly basis. We were spending something like $12,000 in the first year. This year it's something close to $16,000. We don't have additional fees or anything like that. It's a standard subscription.
This price of JBoss is cheaper than similar solutions like Oracle WebLogic. We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive.
I'm not sure of the exact pricing, however, my sense is that it's expensive as the client no longer wants to pay for it and would like to move away from it or onto the cloud.