Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zephyr Enterprise
Ranking in Test Management Tools
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the market share of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 4.8% and it increased by 34.6% compared to the previous year. The market share of Zephyr Enterprise is 7.7% and it decreased by 44.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

VN
Sep 23, 2019
Simple and user-friendly solution that has good stability
I plan to make some tests stand for my view, where I will want to play with the API to start to implement some of the tests because the is the plan to use it as main debt management system. Previously, we used a quality center from IBM but it was old technology. The main point that I want to get from this solution is to integrate this after a test run of the test and see results on JIRA, not on the CI system. When they need to provide some lab reports, of course, we can use a separate solution but business users, product owners will not be able to use it. They don't need such technical details, they need an open task in JIRA to check what failed what passed. We also want it to improve the sync. I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes. They should shorten the time it takes by not using many tabs. There should be more customization abilities. One of my teams can need to create about a hundred test cases and they will need to spend twice time than with Zephyr. The estimation for creating this case will be increased twofold compared to Zephyr.
Tin Bùi - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 21, 2023
Highly stable solution and meets users' needs
It's mostly used for sales and customer verification. We gather customer information and verify that it's a real person Security is always a top priority in the IT business. We would like to see improvements in the security measures to ensure that customer information is protected. I have been…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."
"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."
"The solution does its job well."
"It has many features, but the main things that we need are the test cycles and integration with automation because we have automation for the web and mobile applications. We use it for test case management to run the test cases and get the results. At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements. We are able to get the test execution report and the test pass and fail report. This summary is delivered to our management."
"It has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."
"We use the solution for test case management."
"It has integration with test automation tools."
"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."
 

Cons

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."
"We faced some errors while uploading the test cases."
"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."
"We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches."
"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."
"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."
"It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."
"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
23%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
They should improve the solution's granular reporting feature. It could be more intuitive. It doesn't serve delivery and management purpose. They should integrate the solution with AI. So that, in ...
What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?
We faced some errors while uploading the test cases. The error was not clear. We did not know what the error was.
What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?
We use the solution for test case management.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SmartBear Zephyr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear,  Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient
Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.