Amazon EMR vs Amazon Redshift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EMR
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (3rd)
Amazon Redshift
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the market share of Amazon EMR is 4.4% and it decreased by 7.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Amazon Redshift is 6.6% and it decreased by 49.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
Unique Categories:
Hadoop
14.9%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

CG
Aug 1, 2023
Suitable for online deployments with a serverless architecture
EMR Serverless is useful for online deployments that require a serverless architecture. We were previously using a server-based architecture, but we have since switched to serverless The product is very well-designed. It is easy to use, and it is very cost-effective.   The solution eliminates…
FNU AKSHANSH - PeerSpot reviewer
May 9, 2024
Easy to use, easy to deploy, and the support team is helpful
The solution can be used as a warehouse. We dump any data that exists in our company into it. We spring up different databases based on the requirements The tool is the one place where the company’s data is stored. We use it extensively. Previously, we had data in multiple databases and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is the best tool for hosts and it's really flexible and scalable."
"The solution is pretty simple to set up."
"It has a variety of options and support systems."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."
"The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data."
"One of the valuable features about this solution is that it's managed services, so it's pretty stable, and scalable as much as you wish. It has all the necessary distributions. With some additional work, it's also possible to change to a Spark version with the latest version of EMR. It also has Hudi, so we are leveraging Apache Hudi on EMR for change data capture, so then it comes out-of-the-box in EMR."
"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."
"The solution has very competitive pricing."
"It allows for the storage of huge amounts of data."
"The initial setup of this solution is straightforward."
"I found the Amazon Redshift computing services easy. I found the computing instances the most incredible in the solution."
"Changing from local servers to the cloud is very easy. It's so nice not to have to worry about physical servers."
"The main benefit is that our portal for end users is running in AWS, so we can easily connect it to other AWS services."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability, as it grows according to our needs."
"I like it because the usage is very similar to Microsoft SQL server. The structure of the query and the temporary tables are very similar."
 

Cons

"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."
"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."
"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"The initial setup was time-consuming."
"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."
"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."
"The customer support could be more responsive."
"The technical support should be better in terms of their knowledge, and they should be more customer-friendly."
"Redshift's GUI could be more user-friendly. It's easier to perform queries and all that stuff in Azure Synapse Analytics."
"The solution has four maintenance windows so, when it comes to stability, I think it would be better to decrease their number."
"This solution lacks integration with non-AWS sources."
"Infinite storage is available in Snowflake and is not available in Redshift."
"Running parallel queries results in poor performance and this needs to be improved."
"Sometimes, it's difficult to get the metadata from Redshift."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."
"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."
"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."
"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."
"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
"The product is quite expensive."
"Amazon Redshift is an expensive solution. Larger organizations can afford this solution, but smaller businesses would struggle to afford it."
"One of my customers went with Google Big Query over Redshift because it was significantly cheaper for their project."
"BI is sold to our customer base as a part of the initial sales bundle. A customer may elect to opt for a white labeled site for an up-charge."
"The solution is available at a mid-range price compared to other vendors."
"This solution implements the pay-as-you-use model, so no license. Pricing could be cheaper."
"The part that I like best is that you only pay for what you are using."
"In comparison to the price of similar solutions, Redshift's cost is the lowest."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Educational Organization
52%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EMR?
Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data.
What needs improvement with Amazon EMR?
As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data.
How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic MapReduce
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Yelp
Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EMR vs. Amazon Redshift and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.