Amazon Kinesis vs Axiros AXTRACT comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Kinesis
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Axiros AXTRACT
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Sunil Morya - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 13, 2022
The solution is easy to deploy, scalable, and stable
The solution has the capacity to store the data anywhere from one day to a week and provides limitless storage for us. The data is time-stamped, and the data is in sequence, so we don't need to maintain the sequence or order of the data, and multiple consumers can reference the data in the Kinesis Data Streams simultaneously. Using the same data one application can perform Task A, and another application can perform Task B. The Kinesis Data Stream is integrated with Amazon CloudWatch where we can monitor all the requests of who wants to read information, what kind of APIs are being requested, what errors there are, who is producing them, and who are the data consumers. All the information is logged in one spot and this allows us to identify the problematic points easily. The solution allows us to apply the security so the consumers can have access, based on the subscription they have. Amazon Kinesis has a fan-out feature that allows us to increase the throughput when the number of consumers increases, instead of having to pull the data from the consumer side the information is posted by the solution itself.
Use Axiros AXTRACT?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is fair."
"In general, cloud services are very convenient to use, even if we have to pay a bit more, as we know what we are paying for and can focus on other tasks."
"The pricing depends on the use cases and the level of usage. If you wanted to use Kinesis for different use cases, there's definitely a cheaper base cost involved. However, it's not entirely cheap, as different use cases might require different levels of Kinesis usage."
"The fee is based on the number of hours the service is running."
"Amazon Kinesis is an expensive solution."
"Amazon Kinesis pricing is sometimes reasonable and sometimes could be better, depending on the planning, so it's a five out of ten for me."
"The product falls on a bit of an expensive side."
"The tool's entry price is cheap. However, pricing increases with data volume."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis's main purpose is to provide near real-time data streaming at a consistent 2Mbps rate, which is really impressive.
What needs improvement with Amazon Kinesis?
The solution currently provides an option to retrieve data in the stream or the queue, but it's not that helpful. We have to write some custom scripts to fetch data from there. An option to search ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Amazon AWS Kinesis, AWS Kinesis, Kinesis
AXTRACT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zillow, Netflix, Sonos
Antel, AT&T, Beltelecom, Cable & Wireless, Deutsche Glasfaser Holding GmbH, Etisalat, KPN, ONE Mobily, ABR Telecom
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.