Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd)
k6 Open Source
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (13th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Load Testing Tools category, the market share of Apache JMeter is 27.6% and it increased by 34.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of k6 Open Source is 5.7% and it increased by 8477.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
Performance Testing Tools
29.5%
API Testing Tools
4.8%
 

Featured Reviews

SV
Apr 12, 2023
A useful solution for load testing and testing web applications, but it does not provide page rendering capabilities for end-users
The solution is primarily used for load testing When someone in our organization wants to test web applications, they use Apache JMeter since they face no hurdles while using the solution. Also, we can even increase the number of users using it. All the features mentioned under JMeter metrics…
NalinGoonawardana - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 6, 2023
Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services
One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is scalable."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The metrics part of it and the ability to write your custom code to do some specific tests in the performance testing space are the most valuable features."
"The reporting features are really good. There's a lot less latency than other solutions."
"It's a free tool."
"The solution's initial setup is easy."
"When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations."
"It is easy to set up."
"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."
"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."
 

Cons

"The reporting section of the solution can be better."
"There is some work to be done with the integration."
"In this tool, automation in general is almost non-existent. Everything is done manually."
"The memory utilization in JMeter is very poor."
"The initial setup is complex and needs to be upgraded."
"The solution needs more metrics for reporting."
"In Micro Focus LoadRunner we can go from the UI and we can configure it. There is no such feature in Apache JMeter. There should be UI-based recording history or logs."
"JMeter's reporting is extremely rudimentary. The fundamental reporting mechanisms need to be drastically improved. It doesn't utilize an automatic session management mechanism or methods other tools use like parsing cookies and variables. Everything needs to be done manually. There's no automation."
"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache JMeter is a free tool."
"Apache JMeter is a free, open-source solution."
"We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."
"It is open source. There are no licensing costs associated. If you need enterprise support, you'll probably end up paying for a license. You would also factor in the infrastructure cost, but that's not significant."
"This is an open-source product."
"We are using the free version."
"Apache JMeter is a free tool."
"No licensing is required as it is a free, open-source tool."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
What do you like most about k6 Open Source?
The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.
What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?
One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-co...
What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?
k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.
 

Also Known As

JMeter
Load Impact
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.