Apigee vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Apigee
Ranking in API Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (6th)
webMethods.io Integration
Ranking in API Management
29th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (23rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the API Management category, the market share of Apigee is 17.8% and it increased by 16.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of webMethods.io Integration is 0.7% and it decreased by 14.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
Unique Categories:
API Testing Tools
1.6%
Cloud Data Integration
0.1%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
3.6%
 

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 25, 2022
Has many API management features and is useful in developing a new proxy
Apigee brings a lot of projects, including development projects. For example, when an oil company is swiping a card in the palm station for payment of oil. As it swipes, it hits the database, and Apigee manages the entire process with the help of dedicated proxies. Managing those proxies is very…
Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable
The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io Integrations, there is a lot of work to be done by our company since the newer versions don't offer seamless integration. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement in webMethods.io Integrations. With the solution, our company has experienced sudden outages at times. The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required. Not just the cost related to licensing but also the cost of introducing new versions need improvement in the product. When you have an OS like Windows or Apple, in which some new features are installed when you restart your system, after which everything works fine, with webMethods.io Integration, the new features introduced in the tool don't just need you to stop and restart your application but expects you to update the whole application to be able to use the new functionalities, which is something that is good. My company does a business in which we have to create a complete project which costs a lot of money. In the future, I expect to not be paying a lot of money or extra work to be able to update the product, and webMethods.io Integration needs to update the product automatically.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Highly scalable from any initial topology to horizontal extension"
"Its customer service is good."
"Apigee's best features are flexibility and breadth of capabilities."
"It is scalable."
"Easy interface to monetize and deliver APIs with very easy integration for third-party development environments/delivery."
"Apigee is relatively easy to use for developers."
"The use case which I have installed serves the intended purpose."
"Great flexibility with its features."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
 

Cons

"The solution’s scalability could be improved."
"There should be an integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment approach with Apigee. Currently, for development at a more integrated level, you have set it up yourself."
"Google isn't enthusiastic about supporting older versions. Google is now trying to move all of its clients to X within the cloud."
"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing/buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."
"What my clients don't like is that the on-premises solution is not being treated and maintained as well as the cloud solution."
"Apigee does not have a testing feature."
"Compared to its competitors, such as Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Layer7 API Management, Apigee could benefit from having more policies to cater to various use cases. This would reduce the need for writing custom JavaScripts. If more features come straight out of the box, we can leverage them instead of writing custom code to achieve the same functionality."
"I'd like this solution to improve on releasing new features; I'd like it to be more frequent."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apigee is a pretty expensive solution."
"We have a contract for three years. I don't know the cost."
"The price of Apigee could be less expensive. The solution can be purchased monthly or annually."
"It is an expensive solution."
"Based on your usage of the APIs you can take a decision to go with either an on-cloud or OPDK version. Get in touch with the sales representatives of Apigee."
"You do not necessarily pay for the license. The cloud solution is based more on transactions. So, you pay for it either way."
"The prices are comparable."
"The solution’s pricing could be more competitive."
"The pricing is a yearly license."
"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?
Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...
Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?
Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...
What do you like most about webMethods.io Integration?
The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
What needs improvement with webMethods.io Integration?
The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.i...
What is your primary use case for webMethods.io Integration?
In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
 

Also Known As

No data available
webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson
Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. webMethods.io Integration and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.