Brinqa vs Nucleus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Brinqa
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
14th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (4th)
Nucleus
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (40th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the market share of Brinqa is 2.9% and it increased by 168.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of Nucleus is 2.5% and it increased by 13.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories:
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
8.3%
Application Security Tools
0.4%
 

Featured Reviews

RB
Oct 20, 2023
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
I would give the easiness of the initial setup a seven out of ten. It can be a bit complex. Some connections are straightforward, but some take a long time. Deploying Brinqa took time, as it was done in phases. Initially, it took about six months before we started getting valuable data from it. Then, it expanded from there. The deployment began with a product demo and contract negotiation. We connected some data sources to Brinqa's cloud service, which was straightforward. We used the default risk ranking algorithm but faced issues with the dashboards, so we customized them to fit our organization's needs over a few years. We depended a lot on Brinqa for the deployment. We had some internal resources, but they lacked the needed skills, so it took time to train our two-man team. Initially, it required one person for maintenance, and they spent most of their time on it.
Use Nucleus?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Retailer
9%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Brinqa?
The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Brinqa?
I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
What needs improvement with Brinqa?
Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some stab...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.