Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Netgate TNSR
Sponsored
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Routers (6th)
Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (5th)
Harmony SASE (formerly Peri...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Firewalls (10th), Anti-Malware Tools (9th), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), ZTNA (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (4th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the market share of Netgate TNSR is 0.1% and it increased by Infinity% compared to the previous year. The market share of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 4.6% and it increased by 9.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 1.5% and it increased by 16.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
Unique Categories:
Routers
2.4%
Remote Access
2.1%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
1.1%
Firewalls
0.1%
 

Featured Reviews

Harish (Kumar) - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 3, 2023
Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing
There must be a wizard section as per the use case. For example, if we need a simple firewall there must be an auto-install of most required packages. In the same way, if we need a more strict firewall, then different configuration settings. There must be a more easy-to-use GUI. More documentation should be available within the package manager. A visible ON/OFF button must be there and can be easily configured as required. An additional non-us electrical plug must be inside the box. There should be an option to upgrade RAM (i.e. 8GB to 16GB). It can enhance the capacity of the proxy server.
josephtampient3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 23, 2023
Low cost with good compliance scanning and a VPN auto-connect feature
Check Point Remote Access has been the perfect solution for us for a couple of years now. It helped us to remotely connect to various cloud-based apps and software when we were out of the office during the pandemic. After the end of the pandemic, we continue to use this platform so that all our employees in our real estate sector can connect to specific apps and not neglect their workdays when they are traveling in other states of the country. Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management; it prevents and blocks all types of data leaks and has an authentication for each connection.
reviewer681415 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2023
Intuitive interface, straightforward to set up and ensures secure access
Our company operates within the intricate and highly regulated insurance market. Here, the sanctity of data is paramount and any breach could result in significant consequences for our stakeholders.  Given the sensitive nature of our data and the frequent exchange of confidential information with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents."
"The policies are easy to use."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."
"The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."
"Scaling Perimeter 81 was easy to do."
"The reports give a simple overview of the traffic pattern within the organization."
"It keeps us all accountable and ensures secure internet connections while we all work remotely."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"Overall, the unified agent covers endpoints as well as prevents web browser attacks."
"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."
 

Cons

"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"Some configurations, like idle timeout (the requirement came from multiple users), are not possible to configure directly from the Check Point management server."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"In order to be able to invite users, send the agent and implement it, the user input must be generated manually."
"Branding could be better."
"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."
"They could improve on the available public documentation."
"Sometimes, the product is very slow."
"I'd love to learn more about all of the features. Maybe a monthly spotlight of features or having a banner that explains more ways certain features could be used would be helpful."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"The support is not very good."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN is not expensive and the cost is annual."
"Organizations that already have the Check Point NGFW need to purchase an additional license to have access to the VPN functionality."
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."
"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."
"My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product."
"I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually."
"The solution is pretty expensive. The rating is an eight."
"The price of this product is good."
"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."
"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."
"Regarding pricing, I can say that the more the number of users, the less they have to pay."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."
"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."
"The product's pricing model accommodates diverse needs and deployment sizes."
"Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Security Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Netgate TNSR?
It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netgate TNSR?
The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need ...
What is your primary use case for Netgate TNSR?
THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. Ther...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our pr...
What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed...
 

Also Known As

TNSR
Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Check Point Quantum SASE
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.