Cisco NGIPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco NGIPS
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
14th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the market share of Cisco NGIPS is 4.8% and it increased by 18.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.1% and it decreased by 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

EP
Mar 11, 2019
This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen
It detects attacks from malicious intrusions and malicious activity before they happen This solution has helped improve productivity and detect attacks before they happen. Signature rules from the Snort community around the world. I would like to see better integration with SIEMs.  Better rule…
DP
Aug 8, 2023
User-friendly and straightforward
I use Trellix IPS to find and fix security issues. This involves getting alerts about vulnerabilities in financial systems and sharing information with a partner organization in Sri Lanka. We also use Trellix IPS to spot other vulnerabilities and then block harmful data.  The solution has been…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cisco NGIPS is a stable tool...The technical support provided by Cisco NGIPS is okay."
"Ir's signature-based. We are also using the anomaly baseline formation, where it links the network, then anything that goes away from the norm is also flagged. Those are the two most valuable features."
"The traffic filter of this solution is very valuable to us, and to our clients."
"I like how NGIPS has everything in one console."
"We use the solution for cybersecurity purposes. The tool helps us to identify anomalies that come from internal or external networks."
"The integration with the Cisco portfolio is very helpful."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"You can do zero-day prevention and detection. It's quite useful."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."
"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."
"Great monitoring feature."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
 

Cons

"The user interface needs some improvement, it is a little rudimentary and not very intuitive."
"The biggest problem with most Cisco products is that the interface is lagging behind the competition. The user interface could be updated and improved."
"Cisco NGIPS should work on its shortcomings related to the issues that stem from bugs and performance."
"There is room for improvement in the policy documentation."
"More flexibility with the dashboards is needed because some of them are not fully developed."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution would be better if it offered customers more integrations and more signatures."
"It is no longer scalable because it has gone end of life."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The management component could be simplified."
"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."
"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5."
"The solution is pricey, but worth it."
"Licenses for this product are available for either one, or three year terms."
"I usually work with Fortinet and FortiGate which is a lower cost in comparison with Cisco NGIPS."
"We buy the licensing on a yearly basis, when we renew our contract. It is around $14,000."
"There is a license required to use Cisco NGIPS and it can be a one or three-year license."
"Cisco NGIPS is an expensive product."
"The annual licensing tends to be expensive, but in terms of implementing the licenses, it's a very uncomplicated process and as easy as copy-paste in its straightforwardness."
"The tool is competitively priced."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
University
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?
There are certain limitations that need to be addressed.
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Network Threat Behavior Analysis must be improved. The technical support must be improved. The support team must provide better help with configurations of devices and enabling NTBA.
 

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco NGIPS vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.