CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 28 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,575 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 39 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,566 Views
1,541 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,061 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th)

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the market share of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 4.5% and it decreased by 9.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of One Identity Safeguard is 6.9% and it increased by 25.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

1.6%

Featured Reviews

EzinneNwankwo

Security Engineer at DIL

Aug 15, 2023

A strong part of our zero-trust architecture that makes it easy to manage privileged access

One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices. The solution works fine for servers running Windows 10, but it's not very functional or smooth in operation for servers running Linux and Unix operating systems. There could also be some improvement in integrating with a number of solutions. Though CyberArk keeps developing, improving, or increasing its integrations with other solutions, it could do better. I would also like the initial setup to be easier because we have to engage the services of a partner when setting up the solution. Moreover, the documentation for setup is restricted to partners only. You can get training on the administration of the solution, but the setup and getting some support documents are reserved for partners only. If there were a better way to get this information out there or to make it more accessible, that would reduce the complexity of setting up the solution.

Read full review

Don Naz

Security Architect at a media company with 51-200 employees

Aug 22, 2023

Provides valuable data protection, access to immediate support, and doesn't rely on VPN

Secure Remote Access feature is being utilized by non-technical users, primarily for multi-factor authentications. We are implementing MFA; however, some users in our branch are not yet connected. Consequently, we are resorting to using a VPN in our access control measures. At times, we have also employed remote branches for auditing and monitoring any potentially suspicious activities. Our endpoint security is consistently updated and ensures encryption for all the internet services we utilize. It is important that the Secure Remote Access feature does not rely on a VPN. One Identity Safeguard provides us with the ability to manage access to the system network and data from our remote branches through the Secure Remote Access feature, ensuring a secure and confidential connection on the backend. We have integrated One Identity Safeguard with our DevOps processes to assist in managing the parameters. Prior to the integration, we used to wait for certain automation related to security, either already completed or sometimes people would proceed without reporting. However, after the implementation, it has proven to be highly effective for security testing through automation at various stages, particularly in the pipeline, and for conducting critical analysis. This has significantly improved our understanding.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"Users can scale the solution."

"The product is stable."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

"All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI."

"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."

"Safeguard can define and update processes and procedures into the security framework of a company, including mobile. It allows us to change the policies and configurations on a mass scale in regards to security."

"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."

"One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."

"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."

"The installation process is pretty difficult."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

"The SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together."

"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."

"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."

"It needs more marketing."

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's license is easy to procure."

"The cost for CyberArk is very high."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."

"We pay about $17 per user."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The product's license is easy to procure.

See all answers

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base. Usually, they start at one price, and when you start pricing the competition, you ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts. This is always something you need people to do. It would be especially helpful when you h...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 17% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 41% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 13% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 12% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

June 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

May 2024

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Learn More

CyberArk

One Identity

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

Sample Customers

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

May 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.