DarwinBox vs Sprout HR comparison

"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."

"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."

"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."

"The solution helped us get a fairly good footprint in our channel."

"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."

"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."

"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."

"I don't have direct access to the performance statistics."

"My company makes some yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to DarwinBox."

"Compared with SuccessFactors, there is no major difference in DarwinBox's cost."