FME vs ViaSQL by Adaptigent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

FME
Ranking in Data Integration
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ViaSQL by Adaptigent
Ranking in Data Integration
64th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Integration category, the market share of FME is 2.3% and it increased by 52.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of ViaSQL by Adaptigent is 0.2% and it increased by 1170.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2626457 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 27, 2023
Intuitive with great integrations and excellent spatial features
Improvements could be made to mapping presentations. Though there are functions available for this, it is a complex and broad area that is not covered to the fullest extent. There is a presentation module, however, it is in no way a real GIS. For now, there is the FME Forms product to enter detailed data mapping setups, which is a great tool. However, having an online medium for this would be great. In a future version, it would be great to have a website where you can log in and create your workspace to do the detailed data processing and publish it to the FME Flow environment where it can be used to participate in the general data processing setups.
Use ViaSQL by Adaptigent?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."
"The product's price is reasonable."
"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?
We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?
The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...
What needs improvement with FME?
The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
GT Software Ivory Suite, Ivory Data Access
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System
Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), France Galop, Benefit Programs Administration (BPA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.