Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs PyCharm comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PyCharm
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Static Code Analysis category, the market share of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is 27.6% and it increased by 162.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of PyCharm is 1.7% and it increased by 31.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

NS
Nov 30, 2023
Seamless to integrate and identify vulnerabilities and frees up staff time
The Software Security Center, which is often overlooked, stands out as the most effective feature. This on-premises portal, included with their primary SaaS offering, streamlines the process of triaging our results. With thousands of daily active users, the Software Security Center serves as a centralized platform, consolidating results from various tools, including Sonatype, WebInspect's DAST results, and Pen Test findings from our internal team. This unified view eliminates the need for developers to log into multiple portals to access code vulnerabilities, open-source issues, web app scans, and Pen Test results. Instead, they can access everything they need from a single, convenient location. Secure Code Warrior is an invaluable integration and partnership for us. Fortify consistently collaborates with top-tier companies to deliver cutting-edge solutions. For instance, if a developer encounters a common code vulnerability, such as a path manipulation vulnerability in their Java website, and is unsure of how to resolve it, Fortify provides some guidance and standard response protocols. However, for more in-depth information and assistance, they direct us to Secure Code Warrior. Upon providing information on the vulnerability type and language, Secure Code Warrior offers tailored training courses, such as how to fix path manipulations in Java-based applications. This remediation technique, which is unmatched by any other provider, has proven to be incredibly effective.
YR
Feb 7, 2024
Has good syntax highlighting and is very customizable
It's very easy to use. First of all, I have a professional account, not a community, free account. It's very good for high-level use, as well as for those who are just starting out. It makes it easy for developers to access databases Good syntax highlighting and it's very customizable. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like password credentials and access keys embedded in the code."
"Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between."
"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."
"Fortify integrates with various development environments and tools, such as IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD pipelines."
"Automating the Jenkins plugins and the build title is a big plus."
"The integration Subset core integration, using Jenkins is one of the good features."
"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."
"We write software, and therefore, the most valuable aspect for us is basically the code analysis part."
"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."
"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."
"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."
"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."
"Good syntax highlighting and very it's very customizable."
"The solution has a great debugging feature."
"The best feature of PyCharm is that it gives you hints whenever it detects any issues while you are coding. This is important because it helps us code faster and without any errors."
"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."
 

Cons

"The price can be improved."
"The generation of false positives should be reduced."
"Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a bit of a learning curve, and I don't find it particularly helpful in narrowing down the vulnerabilities we should prioritize."
"The generation of false positives should be reduced."
"It comes with a hefty licensing fee."
"Not all languages are supported in Fortify."
"The product shows false positives for Python applications."
"Their licensing is expensive."
"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."
"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."
"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."
"The navigation can be better."
"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."
"Notebooks in PyCharm is not as intuitive as it could be."
"They should improve the product's interactiveness."
"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."
"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."
"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."
"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."
"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."
"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."
"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."
"The community edition is free, which is good."
"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."
"The price is reasonable."
"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."
"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...
What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
The product shows false positives for Python applications.
What do you like most about PyCharm?
The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.
What needs improvement with PyCharm?
I think there are a few areas where PyCharm could improve. Firstly, the pricing for the professional edition can be quite high, especially for users who need access to advanced features. Next, the ...
What is your primary use case for PyCharm?
I switch between using Visual Studio and PyCharm depending on the task at hand. In Visual Studio, I work on Q, while in PyCharm, I handle Python-related tasks.
 

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.