Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs HPE BladeSystem comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE BladeSystem
Ranking in Blade Servers
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
134
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Blade Servers category, the market share of Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is 0.7% and it decreased by 32.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of HPE BladeSystem is 14.8% and it decreased by 25.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series?
Share your opinion
LA
Mar 9, 2023
Sophisticated, comprehensive management capabilities, and easily expands
The system has versatile applications, as it can serve as a host for various environments, including virtual and DDI environments. Even the Horizon View environment can run exclusively on this system This is a sophisticated solution that covers the entire process, from the components such as…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing is on an annual basis."
"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."
"The price of HPE BladeSystem is less expensive than some other solutions, such as Dell. The cost of replacement equipment is expensive."
"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
"It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
"Its pricing was good. We selected this solution because it was within our budget. We paid just once when we bought it. We never bought any license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...
What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?
The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
 

Also Known As

Primergy BX900 Series
HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial
EMIS Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.