Goda Case SPEC vs IBM Rational DOORS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Goda Case SPEC
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Rational DOORS
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Requirements Management category, the market share of Goda Case SPEC is 0.2% and it increased by Infinity% compared to the previous year. The market share of IBM Rational DOORS is 34.8% and it decreased by 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use Goda Case SPEC?
Share your opinion
KP
Nov 10, 2023
A stable tool for requirement management with good documentation
When the requirements increase within a single model in IBM Rational DOORS, it takes time to save. The requirements are associated with an absolute number in DOORS. For instance, they possess creation dates, modification dates, and information about the creator of each requirement. One specific attribute is absolute number.'The DOORS database automatically generates this absolute number and remains unmodifiable through the API. Therefore, it is not feasible when migrating data from one DOORS system to another or attempting to alter the absolute number through the API. The database generates this absolute number, which is unchangeable. DOORS cannot control or modify these auto-generated absolute numbers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."
"IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."
"The licensing cost is too high."
"We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person."
"I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
"IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive."
"It's expensive."
"It is expensive to onboard additional users."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS?
The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?
I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive. It was a little bit expensive.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?
The modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool like DOORS Next Generation, integrated with Rhapsody. So, integration between Rhapsody modeling and DOORS in the web tool. Another area...
 

Also Known As

Case SPEC, Analyst Pro
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cytonome Inc, Accenture, Cherokee Information Services, The Arborsys Group
Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.