Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs NetApp Snapshot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Ranking in Data Replication
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp Snapshot
Ranking in Data Replication
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Replication category, the market share of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is 8.5% and it increased by 81.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of NetApp Snapshot is 30.8% and it increased by 31.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

BP
Sep 14, 2022
Direct contact with technical support was good, stability is evident, with defined scalability
Script submission allows us to make an application for Hitachi Thin Image and this assists us with synchronization We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data. I have been working with Hitachi Thin Image for the past three months. Hitachi Thin Image is…
GN
Sep 5, 2023
Very user-friendly, extremely stable, and scalable
It would be ideal if mirrored/vaulted snapshots were searchable. If I have to go looking for a file in a stack of snapshots, it's mount one and look, mount another and look, etc. It's a very manual activity. Indexing the data is one thing that traditional backup products bring to the table that to my knowledge, NetApp does not -- and I'm not sure if they ever will. They are very tightly partnered with backup vendors like Rubrik, so they may leave searchability as a third-party option. I don't necessarily have all the software that NetApp makes available, so it's possible they have a solution that I am not aware of. In my day-to-day activities, I'm more concerned with adding better management tools than I am with occasionally having to go get a file by hand. The UI is probably their biggest weakness. There are always 'features' in the HTML UI, but those are minor annoyances, not functional problems. In recent years, NetApp has made a concerted effort to simplify the UX by removing visibility to certain elements, and IMHO, this is the wrong strategy. I can understand the benefits of simplifying by default, but it would be nice if I could turn on the pieces I still want to use. At the very least, there should be a 'God-mode' toggle to turn them all on. With each iteration, there is more information that I can only get from the command line.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."
"The solution is fast and it doesn't use any disc space at all. You can also take as many snapshots as you like. These are the solution's most valuable features."
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"You never have to worry about maintaining millions of files stored across several thousands of virtual machines."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It doesn't occupy a lot of space and is very easy to use once you schedule the snapshots."
"Compared to the traditional way we did backups, with Snapshot it takes us less time. It has improved my organization by saving us time."
"NetApp Snapshot's most valuable features are the snapshot capabilities, you can take snaps of shared directories, files, and VMs."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the repurposing and backup features."
 

Cons

"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."
"The initial setup of NetApp Snapshot is not straightforward. It's not something that you can do just by clicking on the next step button. It has to be designed and it has to be implemented according to your network capabilities and the use case scenario."
"NetApp Snapshot's price could improve to allow them to capture more market shares."
"NetApp needs to take a look at their pricing in comparison to the competition and make the appropriate change to attract more customers and gain in market share."
"The price could be a bit lower."
"The dashboards are in need of improvement."
"The initial setup process of NetApp Snapshot is not easy and needs improvement."
"The price could be improved a little bit."
"The solution could include more databases and make it accessible to the DBAs. The automation process should be run in a way where it could be run from the database itself."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of this solution is fair."
"NetApp Snapshot is expensive since you need to buy an additional premium license for it which is an extra cost over the payments made for NetApp...The license works during the entire life cycle of NetApp Snapshot."
"As far as their licensing costs, the licensing is paid on a yearly basis. The organization pays for the licensing based on the software and the capacity that they choose."
"It's not too expensive."
"The price of NetApp Snapshot depends on the use case. They charge by how much data you need, the capability, and for snap licenses."
"The price of the solution is reasonable but could improve. However, if you are in a country that has a poor currency then the price will be considered expensive."
"If there is a way to save more on the number of snapshots, it should be included in the next release."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
45%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
5%
Import And Exporter
4%
Manufacturing Company
27%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hitachi Thin Image?
We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data.
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Thin Image?
Script submission allows us to make an application for Hitachi Thin Image and this assists us with synchronization.
What method of data replication does NetApp Snapshot use?
Here's a breakdown of how the data replication by NetApp Snapshot works: it's through the snapshot replication method. What does that mean? Well, in simple words, the software creates copies of dat...
What is the storage scale of NetApp Snapshot?
Last time I checked, the NetApp Snapshot data replication software could go up to 255 snapshot copies. I'm not sure how familiar you are with similar software, but that's a pretty good number. It g...
Will NetApp Snapshot recover data in an emergency?
Well yes, the snapshots that NetApp Snapshot creates are your backup. But then there's also their feature for advanced backup. This allows you to copy backups to offline locations and also make arc...
 

Also Known As

Hitachi Thin Image
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Net Credit Financial Group
Mazda
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.