IBM MQ vs Nastel XRay comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MQ
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Business Activity Monitoring (1st), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (1st)
Nastel XRay
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

IF
Mar 18, 2024
Detailed documentation, highly stable, and plenty of features
It may not have all the APIs, features, or protocols that the newest systems have, but in performance and reliability, it is the best. The amount of people needed to maintain the solution depends on the company and how they want to maintain it. When I was working for a bank I supported 300 MQ managers with approximately 150 systems running. However, for the basic use of the solution, you do not need many people. If you add more features, such as broker and clustering you will need more people for maintenance. My advice to others is this solution is the best there is. For maintenance, you will probably need fewer people to maintain it than other solutions because of its reliability. The features are probably the most extensive in its class. I rate IBM MQ a ten out of ten.
Use Nastel XRay?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it."
"The problem with this product is that it's a little bit expensive."
"The price is high."
"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The fee for this solution is on the higher end of the scale."
"The pricing seems good according to the functionality that the solution provides."
"Licensing for this software is on a yearly basis. The standard fee includes the maintenance and updates that are released periodically."
"99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
37%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is MQ software?
Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each pro...
What are the differences between Apache Kafka and IBM MQ?
Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data used for analytics. Apache Kafka is very good if you have a high number of user...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

WebSphere MQ
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.