IBM QualityStage vs Informatica Data Quality comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM QualityStage
Ranking in Data Quality
18th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Informatica Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Data Quality category, the market share of IBM QualityStage is 3.5% and it increased by 357.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Informatica Data Quality is 15.7% and it decreased by 22.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

it_user147546 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 20, 2014
Has allowed my teams of developers to transfer data quickly and easily from SQL databases into Oracle databases.
Yes we have encountered issues with stability. After a successful import and compile of all of our jobs, they would have a “Not compiled” status in Director. Our IBM resource stated we would need to change the odbc file to list a default parameter. This seems to be a common issue with this product, however, I could not find this detailed in the installation documentation. We have also noticed that the tnsnames entry for the oracle database does not connect properly using the full database naming convention. However, when setting up connections to other databases the full path can be used.
Artur-Kowalczyk - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 29, 2024
Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features
We had proof of concepts where certain test cases were given to improve the functionality of the vendor regarding the supply chain. So, it was a proof of concept. It was not applied in production. It was just illustrating the capabilities of the platform, and we were comparing it with other…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price and ten is the highest price."
"The price is high, but the competitors are even higher, like Collibra."
"Informatica is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Informatica Data Quality?
I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica Data Quality?
It's very expensive. It's subscription-based. There are several levels of subscription. The price is high, but the competitors are even higher and more experienced, like Collibra.
What needs improvement with Informatica Data Quality?
It offers integration with some of the latest data platforms, streaming platforms like Kafka, for example. And the setup of the platform is very challenging. Regarding the cloud, it is deployed in ...
 

Also Known As

QualityStage
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PRO BTP, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Sicoob, NICE Systems, Integra LifeSciences Corp.
Condé Nast, Tani, U.S. Xpress Enterprise
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM QualityStage vs. Informatica Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.