IFS Cloud Platform vs ServiceScheduling comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform
Ranking in Field Service Management
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
CRM (12th), Customer Experience Management (6th), Help Desk Software (7th), ERP (9th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (4th), IT Asset Management (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (6th), License Management (2nd)
ServiceScheduling
Ranking in Field Service Management
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

GirirajInja - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 14, 2022
User-friendly interface but lacking robustness
I mainly use IFS Applications for auto management and manufacturing modules IFS Applications has improved our conduct of business. IFS Applications' best feature is the user-friendly interface that has a .NET Framework application in the front end and an Oracle database and WebLogic middleware.…
Use ServiceScheduling?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."
"The pricing is relatively high compared to competitors."
"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."
"Compared to SAP, the pricing for IFS Applications was very affordable. People using the solution would find that it's worth the money."
"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."
"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."
"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."
"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Field Service Management solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?
IFS Cloud Platform is not a cheap solution, and it is an extremely functional one. I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions. From a price per...
What needs improvement with IFS Applications?
I think that with the latest version of the product in the cloud, the user experience is very good since it is highly configurable and very capable software. I have seen that one of the areas that ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Carlsberg, Pukka, Aston Martin, Sky, China Airlines, Cimcorp, Mini, Pepsi.
Mitsubishi Electric, ADT Security Services, Northern Ireland Electricity, ESI Enterprises, Richer Sounds, BrandsMart
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.