Informatica RulePoint vs Software AG Apama comparison

Informatica RulePoint
Read 1 Informatica RulePoint review
  • 41 Views
  • 26 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Software AG Apama
Read 1 Software AG Apama review
  • 104 Views
  • 65 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica RulePoint
Ranking in CEP
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Software AG Apama
Ranking in CEP
1st
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (18th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user7347 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 2, 2013
First Look: Informatica CEP
I got caught up with Informatica recently, checking in with them on their Complex Event Processing (CEP) technologies. They have recently been talking about decision management, especially in healthcare where their new Informatica Proactive Healthcare Decision Management solution is based on their…
Read full review
SP
Oct 25, 2023
A tool to send out promotional notifications that need to improve areas, like deployment and maintenance
Software AG Apama should support offline scenarios as it may not always be possible to stay connected with the cloud. The solution should be deployed on an on-premises model, and it should be able to handle offline scenarios. If certain rules are set in Software AG Apama, then it should be able to execute them without being connected to an open internet source. With Software AG Apama, one may face challenges since it is difficult to find people with the right skill set to operate it. The solution also makes use of a proprietary programming language that is hard to trace in the market. It is better to go with the new options available in the market since Software AG Apama has become an old product. The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CEP solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Software AG Apama?
The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability that it provides its users to handle different kinds of rules.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Software AG Apama?
A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Software AG Apama?
Software AG Apama should support offline scenarios as it may not always be possible to stay connected with the cloud. The solution should be deployed on an on-premises model, and it should be able ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Oracle BAM vs Software AG Apama Logo
Oracle BAM vs Software AG Apama
Compared 100% of the time
More Software AG Apama Competitors
 

Also Known As

CEP
Progress Apama
 

Learn More

Informatica
Software AG
 

Overview

Informatica CEP provides proactive monitoring and operational intelligence by delivering real-time alerts and insight into pertinent information, enabling you to operate smarter, faster, more efficiently, and more competitively. Its real-time alerts are based on sets of conditions defined by business users.
Enables both sell-side and buy-side traders to leverage proprietary trading strategies.
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Okasan Online Securities
See our list of best CEP vendors.

We monitor all CEP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.