One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Omada Identity
Sponsored
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (4th)
One Identity Manager
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (2nd)
RSA Identity Governance and...
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
23rd
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the market share of Omada Identity is 4.1% and it decreased by 24.5% compared to the previous year. The market share of One Identity Manager is 9.5% and it increased by 57.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 0.8% and it decreased by 59.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Management (IM)
Unique Categories:
User Provisioning Software
5.6%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
3.6%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

DE
Mar 25, 2024
Provides good security and excellent administrative features but does not allow customization of reports
The reporting is very poor. It is impossible to see which people are under what rules. Omada is set up to remove employees' access as soon as they leave our organization. It works very well. I use Omada for role-based access control. We can create roles for the team or members of the organization. When they leave the organization, the role is removed automatically. It is beneficial to us. Even though I use Omada, I still need the other systems we use. Omada helps automate reviews of access requests and reroutes them to the appropriate people. I use Omada Connectivity Community, but not much. Overall, I rate the product a 7 out of 10.
SM
Sep 26, 2023
Easy to customize with good support and provides default workflows
Items that can be improved in the solution include pricing, integration, support, and analytics. The update processes for hotfixes need improvement. There are bugs in the system, and even though there are not a lot, there's no information about it until you happen to stumble upon it and then talk to the support, and then the support informs you there has been a hotfix for that for two months. Users need to be informed they exist in advance. Integrations are basically always able to improve. They can always have more standard connectors, more prepaid workflows, more templates, and stuff like that. That said, with the standard rest API and C-sharp and power share connectors you can basically do everything that you need to do even with stuff that is not supported.
Harshul Nayak - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 29, 2022
Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise. We have our own proprietary cloud solution created along with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and it's deployed on the AWS platform. We use RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for a broad level use case for…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"The identity lifecycle support is definitely valuable because we are a complex organization, and there is a lot of onboarding, movement, and offboarding in our organization. We have 31,000 users, and there are a lot of users who are constantly onboarding, offboarding, and moving. So, we need to make sure that these activities are supported. In old times, we used to do everything manually. Everyone was onboarded, offboarded, or moved manually. So, from a business point of view and an economics point of view, identity lifecycle is most valuable. From a security point of view, access review is the most important feature for us."
"For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand."
"The Governance and self-service that can be set up so you can use them yourself to work in the system are the most valuable features. End users can be enabled to help themselves."
"What I like most is that we can always find a solution, and we can also find the cause when something goes wrong. I like that the most because everything is in one way or another traceable. That is what I like most. I like its reliability."
"Surveying is a valuable feature because it allows us to import data and see who has access to what data, for example."
"The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements."
"The back-end, its capabilities, and workflows are very good."
"We have been able to make our help desk self-sufficient by giving them role-based access. We have been able to reduce service dependency by 40% to 50%."
"We chose this product for being able to accommodate our requirements. It's very flexible, and it's open to being developed to our requirements."
"We have seen a slight reduction in help desk calls, as this solution is a self-service product."
"One Identity enables us to provide users with permissions for only the roles that they need. We can use segmentation to ensure that users don't have roles that can cause trouble in the business."
"One Identity Manager is user-friendly and easy to customize. One Identity's business roles enable me to map company structures for dynamic application provisioning, which is fairly important."
"The company policies feature is really good because in workflows you can check whether the policies are all working."
"There are a lot of valuable features, including connectors, attestations, and workflow."
"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."
"RSA Identity Governance and lifecycles are good for the access certification and auditing sections."
"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."
"The data collection is excellent and easy to do. It does not require a lot of configuration nor does it require rules to be written like other competitors do."
"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."
 

Cons

"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"There is room for improvement in Omada's integration capabilities, particularly in streamlining complex integrations and enhancing programming logic for better rule management."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"There's a challenge with handling large amounts of data in this system."
"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."
"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"The backend is pretty good but the self-service request access screen, the GUI, needs improvement. It's an old-fashioned screen. Also, Omada has reports, but I wouldn't dare show them to the business because they look like they're from 1995. I know they are working on these things and that’s good, because they’re really needed."
"There are too many different user interfaces. For example, one is the designer and another is the manager. There's also a web interface and an object browser. It would be helpful to consolidate all of those into a single administrator portal."
"The system role manager, or some of the roles that are inside Identity Manager, are limited to one user. It would be more flexible if these responsibility roles could be attached to many people."
"It is particularly slow if you are using it in a large organization."
"The initial setup was complex. We have a lot of different systems. The journey from implementing to joining all the systems was difficult."
"One area that could be improved is the speed of performance - it's often a bit slower because of the size of its database."
"The philosophy behind One Identity Manager has always been that there's not one way of working and that you can set it up according to your own identity and access management philosophy, but what would make it better is by shortening the setup time and the learning curve time. If the team could create some best practices with a wizard to set the solution up within companies, that would be a killer feature and would help make identity access management more approachable. That would also help companies that don't have the resources or a dedicated team to set up One Identity Manager. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the addition of just released application governance parts. That would sound promising. It would also be interesting if the team sets up best practice startup wizards, so you could set up One Identity Manager according to selectable best practice wizards instead of setting it up completely by yourself."
"The initial set up was quite complex. It takes quite some time to get use to this product because of its complexity."
"The web interface has room for improvement. It could be more performant and the design of the web interface is relatively complicated. It could be simplified."
"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved."
"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."
"Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy costs."
"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."
"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."
"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."
"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is licensed per managed user per year."
"There were a lot of administrator, partner, and supplier accounts for people who were no longer working for us but still in the system. So, we reduced the number of users no longer with the company, which saved us some money on licensing."
"Being Dutch, I can only say that it is extremely expensive, but all software products are expensive. If you have 38,000 users, then even one dollar or one euro per person would amount to a significant amount of money. Because of the high number of users, anything gets expensive very fast here."
"The pricing for Omada Identity is fair."
"While Omada Identity carries a premium price tag, it proves to be cost-effective."
"The pricing is too high for SMBs."
"From an on-prem point of view, the cost is quite transparent and reasonable. The direct cost is primarily for licenses and maintenance on licenses."
"Omada isn't cheap or expensive. The licensing model is flexible. I've only had limited interactions with the Omada sales team, but they were positive. They don't sell the customers more licenses than they need. It's important to accurately forecast future usage. For example, we have many licenses that we don't use because we don't have the identities yet. We pay extra, which isn't good."
"One Identity Manager is fairly priced."
"The pricing is okay."
"We pay yearly and per active user. One of the reasons that we chose One Identity Manager is because of the pricing. It is reasonable and affordable compared to other products which we considered before choosing this solution for the company."
"The licensing cost is per user."
"It's not cheap, but the pricing is okay. Other applications cost about the same."
"It is fairly priced because they provide all the features by default. That is why they charge a bit more than other vendors. I am not sure about the exact cost part, but One Identity is a little bit more expensive than IBM and other tools."
"One Identity Manager has a reasonable price point."
"There are old processes that are really great for some people and look like pieces of artwork. However, the maintenance of them is really expensive."
"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."
"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Omada Identity?
We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Identity?
My client deals directly with the Omada Identity team in terms of licensing. I never look at pricing, so I'm not awar...
What needs improvement with Omada Identity?
There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a rec...
What do you like most about One Identity Manager?
The One Identity birthright process has helped generate user accounts more accurately and quickly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Manager?
I would advise finding and using a development partner for implementation unless you have a dedicated identity manage...
What needs improvement with One Identity Manager?
The One Identity system is very modular. The product is similar to an erector set, where you can do the same thing in...
What do you like most about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.
What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise. We have our own proprietary cloud s...
 

Also Known As

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
Quest One Identity Manager, Dell One Identity Manager
SecurID
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group
Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.