SQL Azure vs Yugabyte Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SQL Azure
Ranking in Database as a Service
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Yugabyte Platform
Ranking in Database as a Service
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Database as a Service category, the market share of SQL Azure is 17.7% and it decreased by 0.9% compared to the previous year. The market share of Yugabyte Platform is 0.7% and it increased by 44.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Zubair_Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 30, 2023
A secure cloud-based relational database solution providing high availability and seamless integration into Azure services
I'm currently involved in setting up pipelines on Azure for data extraction from a source to a target destination within specific time intervals. The goal is to automate the process of moving data efficiently Previously, the database was on-premises, but now, with the SQL database in the Azure…
Use Yugabyte Platform?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like it to be cheaper, but comparatively, it is reasonably priced."
"In terms of the cost, SQL Azure is a pay-per-use solution, particularly because it's a cloud subscription, so you pay as much as you use it."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."
"We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
"When looking at the long-term expenses associated with running software on an on-premises server, the costs are almost equivalent but when we include insurance for devices, onsite fees for servers, and other related costs, we may find that this is a cost-effective solution."
"The license is based on the number of users."
"I believe the licensing is more on a global scale."
"We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Retailer
4%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Educational Organization
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SQL Azure?
The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SQL Azure?
I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
What needs improvement with SQL Azure?
The product's pricing needs improvement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
Plume, Xignite, Kroger, Narvar, Justuno
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, MongoDB and others in Database as a Service. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.