SWIFT InterAct vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SWIFT InterAct
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SWIFTnet FIN
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the market share of SWIFT InterAct is 4.6% and it decreased by 52.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of SWIFTnet FIN is 4.6% and it decreased by 53.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use SWIFT InterAct?
Share your opinion
OS
Mar 29, 2020
Has strong stability and professional support
The initial setup is quite complex. Most of our customers can't deploy SWIFT interfaces by themselves and they need help from certified engineers. It's complex as is. The SWIFT system is complex. The time it takes to deploy will depend on the project. It can take anywhere from one to seven days. If it's for an integration then it will take longer. The users are from smaller financial institutions to very big banks. In some cases the deployment will require one person for one part and up to 10 people from the customer's side; if customers have a complex infrastructure and different people are responsible for different parts of this infrastructure, then it will involve more than 10 people.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
57%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Financial Services Firm
57%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Retailer
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

InterAct
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Seceti
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: May 2024.
787,104 professionals have used our research since 2012.