We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."
"The Test Management options are still weak - improvement is outlined, but not yet visible. I"
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
ACCELQ Automate is ranked 19th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews. ACCELQ Automate is rated 9.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ACCELQ Automate writes "Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". ACCELQ Automate is most compared with Katalon Studio, Eggplant Test, SmartBear TestComplete, Functionize and Testsigma, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.