Acunetix vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Invicti Logo
4,838 views|3,661 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
5,317 views|4,092 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Acunetix and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours.""For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.""It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program.""The usability and overall scan results are good.""We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections.""Picks up weaknesses in our app setups.""The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

More Acunetix Pros →

"Compared to other tools only AppScan supports special language.""The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.""It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply.""It identifies all the URLs and domains on its own and then performs tests and provides the results.""It's generally a very user-friendly tool. Anyone can easily learn how to scan""The solution is easy to use.""The UI was very intuitive.""The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is scanning QR codes."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

Cons
"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection.""When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic.""Currently only supports web scanning.""The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions.""We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic.""The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans.""Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents.""The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

More Acunetix Cons →

"They have to improve support.""I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point.""The pricing has room for improvement.""One thing which I think can be improved is the CI/CD Integration""There is not a central management for static and dynamic.""​IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use​.""HCL AppScan needs to improve security.""The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
  • "Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."
  • "The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."
  • "The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
  • "I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."
  • "The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
  • "When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."
  • More Acunetix Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
    Top Answer:There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others.
    Top Answer:We use the product for dynamic analysis. It also helps us to scan web applications.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.
    Top Answer:Improving usability could enhance the overall experience with AppScan. It would be beneficial to make the solution more user-friendly, ensuring that everyone can easily navigate and utilize its… more »
    Top Answer:I mainly use AppScan to secure various types of applications. I use its DAFDAT solution for black box scanning, as well as SaaS and source code validation. AppScan helps in scanning code for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,838
    Comparisons
    3,661
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    304
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    5,317
    Comparisons
    4,092
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AcuSensor
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Training & Coaching Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Acunetix vs. HCL AppScan
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Acunetix is ranked 17th in Application Security Tools with 26 reviews while HCL AppScan is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews. Acunetix is rated 7.6, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify WebInspect and Veracode, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, OWASP Zap and Fortify on Demand. See our Acunetix vs. HCL AppScan report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.