We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
AgilePoint is ranked 31st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AgilePoint vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.