We performed a comparison between Airlock and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"We preferred the product based on its cost. AWS WAF is an out-of-the-box solution and integrates with the AWS services that we use. It's natively integrated with AWS."
"The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"AWS WAF is something that someone from a cloud background or cloud security background leverages. If they want to natively use a solution in the cloud, AWS WAF comes in handy. It's very useful for that, and the way we can fine-tune the WAF rules is also nice."
"The tool’s stability is very good."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."
"The tool must be simplified."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"The cost must be reduced."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Airlock is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HUMAN Defense Platform and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.