We performed a comparison between Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage."When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one."
"The solution provides big space that is reasonably priced."
"The tool has different types of volumes, like SSD and HDD."
"The product comes with multiple central port installations like gp2 and gp3."
"The most important feature is the volume types in those hundred EDS. For example, if you need a volume with high IOPS, you should choose an io2 or io2 Block Express volume type. The default volume type for EBS is GP3, which is a good balance of performance and price for most workloads."
"The most valuable features of Amazon EBS are the ease of mounting any file system and good for block storage. We can use secondary storage for our difficult instances and it performs well."
"Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers."
"The product’s most valuable feature is IOPS."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"I think performance can be improved."
"Amazon EBS needs to improve its user interface for data transactions."
"There is room for improvement in terms of file storage. Recently, we had a scenario in which, in a file share, we had increased the IOPS capacity; this was for the production environment."
"It is hard to access EBS volumes in different Availability Zones (AZs) because most EBS volumes are created in a single AZ."
"The product data encryption feature needs improvement."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"The features could be improved."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is ranked 10th in Cloud Storage with 16 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8.6, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "Easy to setup and afforadable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is most compared with Microsoft Azure Block Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.