We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use the product for website and email database hosting."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service is a stable solution."
"The solution has good performance."
"The containerization is a valuable feature for us."
"It's quick and easy to have the solution working."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."
"A great UI with very good integrations."
"The product is simple to use for a beginner."
"The scalability potential is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source solution that is easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration."
"The customized deployment process is the most valuable feature in Rancher Labs."
"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."
"Support could be better with response time and knowledge of staff."
"The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The solution needs to be more usable."
"There is room for improvement in the licensing costs. There can be better licensing costs."
"They could provide easier options for third-party integrations similar to internal AWS services."
"The solution could provide more reliability."
"The orchestration of the workloads running in ECS needs improvement."
"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."
"I can't migrate to the newer version."
"The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit."
"If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool."
"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."
"The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."
"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."
"Could be more intuitive."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 8th in Container Management with 46 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 14 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Microsoft Azure Container Service, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Docker, Amazon EKS and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. See our Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.