We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."
"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."
"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database. If you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster. It works on common commodity hardware. You can use any type of server. You don't need to have proprietary hardware. It's fairly flexible."
"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."
"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."
"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"The product is pretty hard to configure."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
"The availability could be better."
"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."
"The solution needs improvement on performance."
"Extra filters would be helpful."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX. See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.