Amazon MSK vs Google Cloud Dataflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
7,618 views|5,959 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Google Logo
4,704 views|3,907 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MSK and Google Cloud Dataflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MSK vs. Google Cloud Dataflow Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, it is very cost-effective based on the workflow.""It offers good stability.""Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.""It is a stable product.""The most valuable feature of Amazon MSK is the integration.""MSK has a private network that's an out-of-box feature.""Amazon MSK has good integration because our team has been undergoing significant changes. Coupling it with MSK within AWS is helpful. We don't have to set up additionals or monitor external environments. This"

More Amazon MSK Pros →

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are the integration, it's very simple if you have the complete stack, which we are using. It is overall very easy to use, user-friendly friendly, and cost-effective if you know how to use it. The solution is very flexible for programmers, if you know how to do scripts or program in Python or any other language, it's extremely easy to use.""I don't need a server running all the time while using the tool. It is also easy to setup. The product offers a pay-as-you-go service.""It is a scalable solution.""The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are scalability and connectivity.""The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.""The service is relatively cheap compared to other batch-processing engines.""The support team is good and it's easy to use.""Google Cloud Dataflow is useful for streaming and data pipelines."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Pros →

Cons
"The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET.""Amazon MSK could improve on the features they offer. They are still lagging behind Confluence.""It should be more flexible, integration-wise.""It would be really helpful if Amazon MSK could provide a single installation that covers all the servers.""The configuration seems a little complex and the documentation on the product is not available.""It does not autoscale. Because if you do keep it manually when you add a note to the cluster and then you register it, then it is scalable, but the fact that you have to go and do it, I think, makes it, again, a bit of some operational overhead when managing the cluster."

More Amazon MSK Cons →

"The solution's setup process could be more accessible.""The technical support has slight room for improvement.""They should do a market survey and then make improvements.""There are certain challenges regarding the Google Cloud Composer which can be improved.""When I deploy the product in local errors, a lot of errors pop up which are not always caught. The solution's error logging is bad. It can take a lot of time to debug the errors. It needs to have better logs.""Google Cloud Data Flow can improve by having full simple integration with Kafka topics. It's not that complicated, but it could improve a bit. The UI is easy to use but the experience could be better. There are other tools available that do a better job.""Google Cloud Dataflow should include a little cost optimization.""I would like Google Cloud Dataflow to be integrated with IT data flow and other related services to make it easier to use as it is a complex tool."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Amazon MSK is less than some competitor solutions, such as Confluence."
  • "The platform has better pricing than one of its competitors."
  • More Amazon MSK Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution depends on many factors, such as how they pay for tools in the company and its size."
  • "Google Cloud is slightly cheaper than AWS."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • "Google Cloud Dataflow is a cheap solution."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Dataflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.
    Top Answer:The product's schema support needs enhancement. It will help enhance integration with many kinds of languages of programming languages, especially for environments using languages like .NET. They… more »
    Top Answer:We use the software to facilitate building integrations between systems.
    Top Answer:The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.
    Top Answer:The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. For some common users, the solution's authentication part is difficult to use. The scalability of the… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 39 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    7,618
    Comparisons
    5,959
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    425
    Rating
    7.2
    7th
    out of 39 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    4,704
    Comparisons
    3,907
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    308
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka
    Google Dataflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.

    Google Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Absolutdata, Backflip Studios, Bluecore, Claritics, Crystalloids, Energyworx, GenieConnect, Leanplum, Nomanini, Redbus, Streak, TabTale
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon MSK vs. Google Cloud Dataflow
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MSK vs. Google Cloud Dataflow and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MSK is ranked 6th in Streaming Analytics with 7 reviews while Google Cloud Dataflow is ranked 7th in Streaming Analytics with 10 reviews. Amazon MSK is rated 7.2, while Google Cloud Dataflow is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon MSK writes "Streamlines our processes, and we don't need to configure any VPCs; it's automatic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Dataflow writes "Easy to use for programmers, user-friendly, and scalable". Amazon MSK is most compared with Confluent, Azure Stream Analytics, Amazon Kinesis, Apache Flink and Aiven for Apache Kafka, whereas Google Cloud Dataflow is most compared with Databricks, Apache NiFi, Amazon Kinesis, Spring Cloud Data Flow and Apache Flink. See our Amazon MSK vs. Google Cloud Dataflow report.

    See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.