Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,253 views|7,505 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
MongoDB Logo
6,216 views|3,418 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Sep 8, 2022

We compared Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: For the most part, users of both Amazon RDS and MongoDB Atlas feel that they are relatively easy to deploy.
  • Features: Users of both products feel that they are stable and scalable.

    Users of Amazon RDS find its replication features to be one of its more valuable features. However, they would like to see its integration capabilities improve.

    Reviewers of MongoDB Atlas feel that its integration features are one of its most useful. However, they say that its administration capabilities could be more user friendly.

  • Pricing: For the most part, users of both products feel that they are expensive to purchase.
  • Service and Support: For the most part, users of Amazon RDS find their technical support to be pretty effective. Reviewers of MongoDB Atlas find the technical support that it provides to be first rate.

Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, MongoDB Atlas seems to be the superior solution. The main difference between these products comes from the powerful integrations that MongoDB Atlas offers. Amazon RDS’s integrations leave room for improvement.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing.""Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality.""The most valuable feature is that it is a fully managed database, where they handle most of the administrative tasks and leaves the users more time to concentrate on business.""Encryption is the most valuable feature.""Amazon RDS gives us the ability to select as many tools, replicas, regions, and zones as we want.""The solution's customer service is excellent.""The solution is good for on-premise deployments.""The dashboard and performance are the most valuable features of Amazon RDS."

More Amazon RDS Pros →

"It's flexible. We don't need to have a solid upstream availability failover, and everything is seamless in Atlas.""The initial setup is straightforward.""It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data.""The auto-scaling feature is the most valuable aspect.""It has a flexible integration with our easy API.""The product is user-friendly.""The product allows us to easily set up and store large amounts of unstructured data.""MongoDB Atlas is very easy to use and user-friendly, and you get what you're paying for."

More MongoDB Atlas Pros →

Cons
"Technical support could be better.""Amazon RDS should have a more user-friendly graphical user interface and include better database management options.""The solution's connectivity and response logs could be improved.""A lot of the features are disabled by default. The solution should enable more features. I understand this could cause challenges to management for many clients using RDS, however.""AWS support is decent, but it's not as good as before. Sometimes, we get junior staff who are unable to answer our questions. It also depends on the support team you get. Support based in Europe and Australia is better than US support. For example, European support is quick to deliver the right answer. US support handles routine maintenance issues, and it's mostly junior staff who don't know the product well.""The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI.""In the next release, it would be great to see RDS provide connection pooling out of the box.""The product should support new databases."

More Amazon RDS Cons →

"The initial configuration fine-tuning for performance can be time-consuming.""MongoDB Atlas should improve its user experience by providing better explanations or a wizard for people working with its UI.""They could explore ways to facilitate deploying MongoDB containers within the platform.""In the past, MongoDB offered more features for free, but now it's quite limited. The free version is limited, and you need to pay extra to fully utilize it. The pricing could be improved.""Going forward, we would like to have pure AWS Cloud (native) storage instead regular storage on the AWS integration side.""The biggest challenge we all have is an application layer level. One node is sitting in the APAC region, another node is sitting in the US and UK region. The seamless replication has to be lightning fast, but we haven't tested the scalability yet.""One improvement that I would like to see is a feature to export changes made in the environment, such as creating a new user.""The replica side, like the venue, can be improved."

More MongoDB Atlas Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."
  • "The cost of using this solution is similar to that of having your own data center."
  • "The price could be better."
  • "It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."
  • "We are paying for a service license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."
  • "Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."
  • More Amazon RDS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing and licensing is great."
  • "The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace was very good."
  • "In my previous company, the product allowed use to build a database in a highly regulated environment with the ability to get distributed storage. We used MongoDB as a distributed storage to set up this environment for a critical business application with millions of dollars."
  • "It is too expensive. They need to work on this."
  • "The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."
  • "Pricing could always be better."
  • "We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."
  • "The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments."
  • More MongoDB Atlas Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.
    Top Answer:The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Top Answer:There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is not that expensive, but it can be, especially when we have deployed it across multiple zones.
    Top Answer:The scalability aspect is quite difficult to implement. It should be much easier for the end user. You cannot use less than two nodes; you have to use at least two nodes, and they categorize their… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    9,253
    Comparisons
    7,505
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.4
    3rd
    Views
    6,216
    Comparisons
    3,418
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    473
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RDS
    Atlas
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

    MongoDB Atlas is a developer data platform that provides a tightly integrated collection of data and application infrastructure building blocks to enable enterprises to quickly deploy bespoke architectures to address any application need. Atlas supports transactional, full-text search, vector search, time series and stream processing application use cases across mobile, distributed, event-driven, and serverless architectures.

    A key advantage of MongoDB Atlas is flexibility - it makes it easy to adjust storage and computing resources on the fly. This scalability ensures optimal performance even for workloads with fluctuating demands, without overprovisioning infrastructure. You only pay for what they use. Atlas also enables deploying globally distributed databases that improve data access speeds and provide built-in redundancy for high availability.

    On the security front, Atlas offers robust encryption, access controls, and complies with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA out-of-the-box. Its real-time analytics and full-text search empower businesses to quickly gain insights from data to drive better decisions. The document-oriented data model is versatile for handling varied data types - ideal for modern applications dealing with unstructured data.

    Additional Atlas capabilities include simplified deployment, built-in disaster recovery, reduced time-to-market and costs, increased agility and scalability. It can power web, mobile, IoT and other applications. With extensive documentation and an active community, getting started with Atlas is straightforward even for lean teams.

    Technical Perspectives:

    • MongoDB Atlas utilizes a document data model, which is intuitive and flexible, allowing faster evolution in response to changing business requirements. This model eliminates the need for expensive JOINs and ORM layers, improving performance and simplifying data handling​​.
    • Traditional relational databases often require complex schema designs and ORM layers, adding to the workload of developers and DBAs. MongoDB Atlas offers a more streamlined approach with its document model, reducing the complexity and improving agility​​.

    Peer Reviews and Practical Insights:

    • The solution is highly rated for its robustness, ease of deployment, and sustainability.
    • Technical support and pricing are areas highlighted for improvement.
    • Comparisons with other database solutions like Microsoft SQL Server suggest that MongoDB Atlas is cost-effective, especially considering enterprise-level offerings​​.
    • Local support and escalation processes are mentioned, indicating a robust support structure for troubleshooting​​.

    In conclusion, MongoDB Atlas presents a versatile and efficient cloud database solution, particularly favored for its managed services, scalability, and security. The platform's ability to adapt to various application requirements, coupled with its intuitive document model, positions it as a strong contender in the cloud database market.

    Sample Customers
    Edmodo
    Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company41%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon RDS is ranked 1st in Database as a Service with 45 reviews while MongoDB Atlas is ranked 3rd in Database as a Service with 43 reviews. Amazon RDS is rated 8.4, while MongoDB Atlas is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon RDS writes "Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB Atlas writes "Allows our business to analyze social media data with machine learning and store the data in MongoDB". Amazon RDS is most compared with Google Cloud SQL, SQL Azure, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, whereas MongoDB Atlas is most compared with SQL Azure, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service, Google Cloud Spanner and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer. See our Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.