We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Anypoint MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"It's very quick and easy to build or set up Amazon SQS."
"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"There is no setup just some easy configuration required."
"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."
"Good interface, simple to use and stable."
"The use of ACK is valuable."
"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."
"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."
"The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."
"Be cautious around pay-as-you-use licensing as costs can become expensive."
"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"Support could be improved."
"As a company that uses IBM solutions, it's difficult to compare Amazon SQS to other solutions. We have been using IBM solutions for a long time and they are very mature in integration and queuing. In my role as an integration manager, I can say that Amazon SQS is designed primarily for use within the Amazon ecosystem and does not have the same level of functionality as IBM MQ or other similar products. It has limited connectivity options and does not easily integrate with legacy systems."
"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."
"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."
"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."
"The customer service is not good enough"
"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."
"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."
Amazon SQS is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 10 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Anypoint MQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited". Amazon SQS is most compared with Redis, Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service and ActiveMQ, whereas Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware Tanzu Data Services, IBM MQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Amazon SQS vs. Anypoint MQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
