We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"The product is stable."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"The graphical user interface can be improved."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The documentation must be improved."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while AuraQuantic is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda and Bizagi. See our Apache Airflow vs. AuraQuantic report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.