We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Bitbucket is a standard source code repository with all the features you would expect. It supports Git and SVN. It's an extensive tool that provides us with merging, branching, and change management capabilities. You can compare the changes with the current and previous versions."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"Fine tuning for procedures and features related to analytics and code validation is needed."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"The scalability could be improved."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.