We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics and others in Mobile APM."We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part."
"The deep-process instrumentation gave us an opportunity to understand application process performance in detail."
"With the new feature CA Team Center is much easier to view the information of my user experience, with this unified vision, it was even practical for lay users to use the tool"
"The most valuable features are the low overhead, the ability to monitor production on 24/7 principle, the ability to decrease time to discover the point of failure in the IT infrastructure or the application environment in a short period of time, reporting for analyzing the performance of the application for improving the code optimizing process."
"The CA tools allow to me to get into detailed transactions for custom ranking, and be able to make predictions. It also gathers data. Some other tools may be good at one area, but not good overall, including the mainframe."
"The triage can find the root cause for pent up issues."
"Standard available reports provide us with an automatic insight into the top ten situations to watch. It would have been extremely difficult to program such a report ourselves, and to my knowledge no other competitor can match this functionality."
"I like that it gives you a wide range of data where you can see the application outage response from concurrent locations and the number of stalled jobs."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"Upgradability to it is a project instead of a patch. If it was actually an automated process to where it just fed updates to our product that would be great. Now, we have to spin up an effort to actually upgrade the solution."
"We need more capabilities to analyze the information that tools collects; for example, using artificial intelligence, or something like that."
"Issue resolution needs to be faster, rather than having users wait for the next release for issues to be fixed."
"Technical support is slow to respond and also asks redundant questions."
"As applications move to the cloud, we need more cloud-based solutions from CA APM. This is currently unavailable."
"Documentation needs to be centralized."
"The front-end representation should match other competitors such as AppDynamics."
"I would like them provide more guidance on specific tuning of monitoring options to avoid unacceptable overhead."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, New Relic and BMC TrueSight Operations Management.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.