We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Sysdig Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has improved my organization because we are able to proactively and reactively look at performance issues."
"We previously had an operations team continuously monitoring applications. Now, they just have set things up and our developers can monitor, view, and act on them, accordingly."
"Error analysis in the troubleshooting sections go straight to the point."
"It is a wonderful monitoring tool that manages various aspects such as system resources (CPU, RAM), mobile performance, and infrastructure monitoring."
"AppDynamics is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the fact that it is very easy to use, making it easy to implement...It is a very stable solution."
"We're a large organization, so we appreciate AppDynamics' wide coverage. It may not work in all areas, but it has broad coverage. We can use the same dataset for different use case aspects. That is the beauty of AppDynamics. You can coordinate APM, EUM, and infrastructure through one dataset."
"It helped to find quick solutions for specific business transactions."
"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."
"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."
"Sometimes, it is hard to navigate through and find if something is wrong or figure out where an error stemmed from."
"The worst part is that the AppDynamics SaaS Environment has a lot of downtimes, and AppDynamics, despite our efforts, does not give us any feedback on these downtimes/incidents."
"The initial setup could be easier."
"The documentation and training material have room for improvement."
"Regarding Search Guard functionality, there is room for improvement."
"The cloud licensing needs to be improved. It's quite pricey."
"The infrastructure is not as good as other solutions."
"The Log Analytics feature is a bit complicated."
"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."
""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics is ranked 2nd in Container Monitoring with 155 reviews while Sysdig Monitor is ranked 9th in Container Monitoring. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Sysdig Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sysdig Monitor writes "The ability to stop and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Sysdig Monitor is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Dynatrace. See our AppDynamics vs. Sysdig Monitor report.
See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.