We performed a comparison between AppWorx Workload Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AppWorx Workload Automation is highly regarded for its intuitive interface and reliable functionality. Users appreciate its user-friendly design and consistent performance. AutoSys Workload Automation is praised for its impressive scalability and ease of use. Users value its quick processing speed and constant availability. In addition, AutoSys provides additional features such as file transfer protocol and file watcher, enhancing its capabilities.
Users of AppWorx Workload Automation are seeking enhanced API integration and improved integration with other tools. Additionally, they desire better scalability. AutoSys Workload Automation users are in need of integration with cloud services, simplified reporting and comparison of job performance, and access to more advanced features and functionalities.
Service and Support: AppWorx stands out for its exceptional technical support, while AutoSys is commended for being highly supportive and responsive.
Ease of Deployment: AppWorx Workload Automation's initial setup is time-consuming, requiring several months to complete and administrator involvement. AutoSys Workload Automation offers a quick and effortless setup that can be done in approximately 10 minutes with minimal clicks. It is regarded as straightforward and simple.
Pricing: AppWorx Workload Automation's setup cost is based on the number of systems used, which can be costly. AutoSys Workload Automation offers different pricing and licensing choices, including a one-time license fee for server setup and the possibility of monthly payments for certain users.
ROI: AppWorx Workload Automation lacks details regarding ROI. AutoSys Workload Automation provides advantages such as heightened productivity, enhanced efficiency, cost-effectiveness, improved visibility, and minimized downtime.
Comparison Results: AutoSys Workload Automation is the preferred choice over AppWorx Workload Automation. Users praise AutoSys for its quick and simple setup process, scalability, ease of use, speed, and availability. It offers valuable features like job orchestration, real-time batch processing view, and a user-friendly interface.
"The automated solution is the most valuable piece. Otherwise, we would have to be doing everything manually on every server."
"It is an object-based approach to task and process design in conjunction with conditional logic and event-based scheduling actions, which enables a build once/use often design methodology to be employed."
"The interface is good."
"It is really a robust product."
"Scheduling is a good feature."
"The solution is very user friendly so anyone can use it."
"The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better."
"We have a lot of nightly jobs that need to be run. Therefore, we perform a lot of calculations and processes during nighttime hours."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"It can run an object on our Windows systems or our Unix systems, and then send messages to the other system when they are complete."
"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."
"Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language."
"Easy configuration and integration with SAP."
"We don't have to manually run things anymore. We can have the work that a team of 50 people would do, all inside of one platform."
"The compliance features are limited to the server and not the entire infrastructure."
"It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD)."
"We are looking for additional features that would allow us to call APIs and integrate the product with other tools more effectively."
"The scalability could improve."
"The graphical interface is pretty cool but not the best so it could use some improvement."
"As a general process automation and integration tool, it has been superseded by other offerings, notably the Workload Automation suite."
"The internal security model can be complex when configuring multiple user groups."
"It has been a deprecated product, because it is so old. There has been a couple of new solutions that are a little more advanced."
"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
AppWorx Workload Automation is ranked 17th in Workload Automation with 7 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. AppWorx Workload Automation is rated 8.0, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppWorx Workload Automation writes "The scheduling tool and finance module are valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". AppWorx Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M and Automic Automation Intelligence, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch. See our AppWorx Workload Automation vs. AutoSys Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.