We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are mainly using Aruba ClearPass for our clients for securing access to their on-premise assets. As per customer expectations, we are trying our best to track the complete user activity in the network. This is the main and the core feature we require."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the authentication mechanisms and the integration with Active Directory(AD)."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The aspect of Aruba ClearPass that I like most is that it has a lot of options, it is very versatile."
"What I like most about Aruba ClearPass is its access tracker that serves as its monitoring feature. The access tracker is really helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures."
"The interface is very easy to use and the workflow is quite straightforward."
"It is beneficial from a security perspective because not everyone can connect to our wifi without going through an authentication process."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the GUI and its ease-to-do configuration. Additionally, we can troubleshoot many things in one window."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"I would like to see better integration with the firewall for zeroing out blacklisted users."
"In the next version, I would like to see some enhancement or extension on the tracking side. For example, when any user enters the network, it should be more visible in the graphical form."
"The pricing policy could be more flexible."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"The user interface should be improved. The logs and how the logging mechanism works can also use an upgrade."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve when it comes to troubleshooting, it can be difficult. Some advanced problems are difficult."
"After HP, their support is the worst."
"ClearPass' GUI could be more user-friendly."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Varonis Platform, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.