We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and ESP Workload Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task."
"Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language."
"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"The solution can scale."
"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
"In terms of what should be in the next release, I want integration and AI and so on. I'd like easy reporting where you can compare information, for example, "that job normally takes three minutes and last time it took six minutes or 10 minutes." Then you can get the information to the engineer of which job is taking more time than normal - understanding strange behavior compared to the baseline."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."
"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is ranked 23rd in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence writes "Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and ActiveBatch by Redwood, whereas ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, IBM Workload Automation and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.