We compared AWS Backup and Rubrik Go across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: AWS Backup is highly regarded for its flexibility and point-in-time recovery options. Users appreciate AWS Backup’s snapshot feature that allows them to back up applications to a secondary site. Rubrik Go is highly regarded for its impressive data visualization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: AWS Backup could enhance its reporting and visualization, user interface, encryption options, and troubleshooting indicators. Rubrik Go needs to address its expensive pricing and improve security visibility.
Service and Support: Some users described AWS Backup's customer service as amazing, but others noted that AWS support may take longer to resolve complex issues. Rubrik Go's support is recognized for its timely and effective resolution of customer issues.
Ease of Deployment: Users reported varying experiences setting up AWS Backup. Some said it took only a few minutes, but others said it could take up to 10 days. Rubrik Go is straightforward to set up and can be installed in just one day.
Pricing: AWS Backup’s pricing is generally regarded as reasonable and flexible. There are no licensing fees. Users are only charged for backup storage and data transfer. However, some users consider the model to be costly and complex. Rubrik Go is known for its higher pricing, which is charged on a monthly basis.
ROI: AWS Backup offers significant value by enabling backup restoration and readiness for unforeseen events. Rubrik Go offers a varying return. To obtain detailed insights, refer to user feedback or reach out to the respective providers.
Comparison Results: AWS Backup provides flexibility in services, point-in-time recovery, and seamless integration. At the same time, some users noted that AWS Backup requires specific configuration knowledge and has room for improvement in reporting and restore functionality. Rubrik Go stands out for its solid support and exceptional data visualization capabilities. Users say Rubrik Go needs to address its high cost and improve security visibility.
"We can directly back up EC2 instances in AWS without using any third-party applications."
"The most valuable feature is the daily incremental site backup."
"It's very easy to configure. Since it's a managed service, it's very straightforward to set up and use. And my customers get on with it very fast."
"The advantage that AWS Backup has over competitors is that it's very simple."
"The solution's most valuable features are its backup capability and tight integration with other AWS services."
"RDS backup is one of the most crucial components of any client's cloud environment, so we generally use that. Additionally, we store EBS snapshots in S3."
"It provides an easy data migration process from on-premise to cloud."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use for backing up VMs."
"The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities."
"It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated."
"In terms of stability, the product is good."
"The solution's reporting features and restore features can be improved."
"If AWS could also add some hybrid cloud features to AWS Backup, that would be a significant improvement. For example, currently, AWS Backup only backs up to the S3 and Amazon Cloud, and you can only restore from the Amazon Cloud only. However, some people have hybrid environments. They have some workloads on-premises and some workloads in the cloud."
"This backup tool does the full backup of the entire snapshot server. I would like to have the option to not do the full server backup."
"Only the price could be improved."
"For additional functionalities, it should be more intelligent, like more AI-capabilities."
"When it comes to encrypting data, it is not so convenient."
"There could be a centralized dashboard with a reporting feature notifying us of daily backup status."
"They should work on their visual capabilities."
"If you were to compare it to, say, EMC, the availability of the documentation, training programs, and end-user education aren't as good. Rubrik could improve this."
"Rubrik Go's security visibility could be improved."
"The tool's pricing needs to be improved."
"If you're going for Rubrik, you are not opting for the tape library because Rubrik doesn't have the fiber cable connected to the tape library."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
"Being a modern backup solution, Rubrik should have an option to back up a Kubernetes cluster."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
AWS Backup is ranked 4th in SaaS Backup with 23 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. AWS Backup is rated 8.0, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Backup writes "Useful point-in-time recovery, highly scalable, and implementation straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". AWS Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with Commvault Cloud and Own Data Platform. See our AWS Backup vs. Rubrik Go report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.